This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (25)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related article  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Quality of Care, Other  • Hepatobiliary Surgery  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

B. Tang, MD; G. B. Hanna, PhD, FRCS; P. Joice, MA, MB ChB; A. Cuschieri, MD, FRSE

Arch Surg. 2004;139:1215-1220.

Hypothesis  Surgical operative performance benefits from analysis of the mechanisms underlying technical errors committed during surgery.

Design  Prospective study using the Observational Clinical Human Reliability Assessment (OCHRA) system and complete unedited videotapes of the operations.

Setting  Three National Health Service hospitals within the United Kingdom.

Patients  Two hundred consecutive patients with symptomatic gallstone disease.

Interventions  Elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic gallstone disease by surgeons, who were blind to the nature and objectives of the study, using their usual operative technique.

Main Outcome Measures  Surgical consequential and inconsequential operative errors.

Results  The analysis of 38 062 steps of the 200 laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed by 26 surgeons identified 2242 errors. The mean ± SD total, inconsequential, and consequential errors per surgical procedure were 11.0 ± 8.0, 8.0 ± 6.0, and 4.0 ± 3.0, respectively. Dissection of the Calot triangle (second task zone of the operation) incurred more total errors (6.5 ± 5.4) compared with the first (2.9 ± 2.8, P<.001) and third (5.1 ± 3.9, P<.05) task zones. This translated to a higher error probability (6.9% vs 3.5% for the first and 5.5% for third task zones). The combined sharp and blunt dissection method had fewer errors than the blunt/teasing dissection technique (9.45 ± 7.6 vs 13.9 ± 7.3, P<.001) although different surgeons were involved. The most serious consequences were encountered during dissection with the electrosurgical hook knife.

Conclusion  This study has confirmed that the Observational Clinical Human Reliability Assessment system provides a comprehensive objective assessment of the quality of surgical operative performance by documenting the errors, the stage of the operation in which errors are enacted most frequently, and where these errors have serious consequences (hazard zones).

Author Affiliations: Surgical Skills Unit, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, Scotland (Drs Tang, Joice, and Cuschieri); and the Department of Oncology and Technology,St Mary’s Hospital, Imperial College, London England (Dr Hanna).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

This Month in Archives of Surgery
Arch Surg. 2004;139(11):1145.
FULL TEXT  

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The Oxford NOTECHS System: reliability and validity of a tool for measuring teamwork behaviour in the operating theatre
Mishra et al.
Qual Saf Health Care 2009;18:104-108.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The effects of aviation-style non-technical skills training on technical performance and outcome in the operating theatre
McCulloch et al.
Qual Saf Health Care 2009;18:109-115.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Human factors in anaesthetic practice: insights from a task analysis
Phipps et al.
Br J Anaesth 2008;100:333-343.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Human Reliability Analysis of Cataract Surgery
Gauba et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2008;126:173-177.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Methodological Infrastructure in Surgical Ergonomics: A Review of Tasks, Models, and Measurement Systems
Lee et al.
SURG INNOV 2007;14:153-167.
ABSTRACT