You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 139 No. 11, November 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Review Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (14)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Surgical Interventions, Other
 •Review
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Trocar Site Hernia

Hitoshi Tonouchi, MD, PhD; Yukinari Ohmori, MD; Minako Kobayashi, MD, PhD; Masato Kusunoki, MD, PhD

Arch Surg. 2004;139:1248-1256.

Objective  To review the relationship between the pathogenesis and clinical manifestations of trocar site hernias seeking to confirm the definition of trocar site hernias by classification.

Data Sources  We searched this subject in English on MEDLINE by combining the words "trocar," "port," "hernia, and "laparoscopy."

Data Extraction and Study Selection  We limited the main operations to cholecystectomy, colon and rectal surgery, fundoplication, and gastric surgery; finding 44 reports on these procedures. Of these, 19 were case reports, 18 were original articles (setting criteria; the incidence of the trocar site hernia was clarified, and involved >100 patients), and 7 technical notes on "how to do it" were collected. We obtained 19 additional reports using the references of those previously obtained. We, thus, reviewed 63 reports (24 case reports, 27 original articles, 7 technical notes, and 5 review articles).

Data Synthesis  Trocar site hernia was classified into 3 types. The early-onset type that occurred immediately after the operation, with a small-bowel obstruction, especially the Richter hernia, frequently developing. The late-onset type that occurred several months after the operation, mostly with local abdominal bulging with no small-bowel obstruction developing. The special type that occurred indicated the protrusion of the intestine and/or omentum. Trocar site hernias with fascial defects of 10 mm or larger should be closed, including the peritoneum. Opinion varied if a 5-mm trocar site defect should be closed.

Conclusion  It is useful to clearly classify trocar site hernias to improve management of laparoscopic procedures.


Author Affiliations: Departments of Innovative Surgery (Drs Tonouchi, Ohmori, Kobayashi, and Kusunoki) and Surgery II, Mie University School of Medicine, Mie, Japan (Dr Kusunoki).



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Spectrum of Biliary and Nonbiliary Complications After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Radiologic Findings
Kim et al.
Am. J. Roentgenol. 2008;191:783-789.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Robotic Trocar Site Small Bowel Evisceration After Gynecologic Cancer Surgery
Seamon et al.
Obstet Gynecol 2008;112:462-464.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prevention of Trocar Site Hernias: Description of the Safe Port Plug Technique and Preliminary Results
Moreno-Sanz et al.
SURG INNOV 2008;15:100-104.
ABSTRACT  

Is Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Cholecystectomy as Safe as Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy?--Reply
Marescaux et al.
Arch Surg 2008;143:604-605.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.