You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 139 No. 2, February 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (13)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Surgery, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Hospital Teaching Status and Outcomes of Complex Surgical Procedures in the United States

Justin B. Dimick, MD; John A. Cowan, Jr, MD; Lisa M. Colletti, MD; Gilbert R. Upchurch, Jr, MD

Arch Surg. 2004;139:137-141.

Hypothesis  Complex operations performed in teaching hospitals have similar outcomes as those performed in nonteaching hospitals.

Design  Observational cohort study with clinical patient data obtained from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. The Nationwide Inpatient Sample data were linked to the American Hospital Association hospital survey data for 1997 to determine hospital characteristics. Hospitals were considered high volume if they performed more than the median (50th percentile) number of procedures per year.

Setting  Nationally representative sample of hospitals during 1996 and 1997.

Patients  Individuals undergoing esophageal resection (n = 1247), hepatic resection (n = 2073), or pancreatic resection (n = 3337) in Nationwide Inpatient Sample hospitals during 1996 and 1997 were included.

Main Outcomes Measures  Unadjusted and adjusted in-hospital mortality and prolonged length of stay (>75th percentile).

Results  None of the procedures had higher operative mortality rates at teaching hospitals. In unadjusted analyses, pancreatic resection (4.0% vs 8.8%; P<.001), hepatic resection (5.3% vs 8.0%; P = .03), and esophageal resection (7.7% vs 10.2%; P = .10) had lower operative mortality rates at teaching compared with nonteaching hospitals. However, after adjusting for hospital volume in the multivariate analysis, hospital teaching status was no longer a predictor of operative mortality.

Conclusions  Teaching hospitals have lower operative mortality rates for complex surgical procedures. However, the lower mortality rates at teaching hospitals can be explained by higher procedural volume.


From the Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor.


RELATED ARTICLE

This Month in Archives of Surgery
Arch Surg. 2004;139(2):127.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Are Surgical Outcomes for Lung Cancer Resections Improved at Teaching Hospitals?
Meguid et al.
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2008;85:1015-1025.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Extending the CONSORT Statement to Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatment: Explanation and Elaboration
Boutron et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2008;148:295-309.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Justifying Patient Risks Associated With Medical Education
Chiong
JAMA 2007;298:1046-1048.
FULL TEXT  

Standards for Thoracic Surgical Oncology in a Single-Payer Healthcare System
Sundaresan et al.
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2007;84:693-701.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

In-Hospital Mortality for Children With Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome After Stage I Surgical Palliation: Teaching Versus Nonteaching Hospitals
Berry et al.
Pediatrics 2006;117:1307-1313.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Academic medicine: the evidence base
International Working Party to Promote and Revital
BMJ 2004;329:789-792.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.