You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 139 No. 2, February 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (26)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Women's Health
 •Women's Health, Other
 •Breast Cancer
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy

Technique and Results of 54 Procedures

Joseph P. Crowe, Jr, MD; Julian A. Kim, MD; Randall Yetman, MD; Jillian Banbury, MD; Rebecca J. Patrick, MA; Deborah Baynes, PA-C

Arch Surg. 2004;139:148-150.

Hypothesis  The rationale for removal of the nipple-areolar complex (NAC) during total mastectomy centers on long-standing concerns about possible neoplastic involvement of the NAC and its postoperative viability. Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) combines a skin-sparing mastectomy with preservation of the NAC, intraoperative pathological assessment of the nipple tissue core, and immediate reconstruction, thereby permitting better cosmesis for patients undergoing total mastectomy. Neoplastic involvement of the NAC can be predicted before surgery and assessed during the operation, and sustained postoperative viability of the NAC is likely with appropriate surgical technique.

Results  Fifty-four NSMs with immediate reconstruction were attempted among 44 patients. Six NAC core specimens revealed neoplastic involvement on frozen section analysis, resulting in conversion to total mastectomies. Forty-five of the 48 completed NSMs maintained postoperative viability of the NAC; 3 NACs had partial loss.

Conclusion  Nipple-sparing mastectomy is a reasonable option for carefully screened patients.


From the Departments of General Surgery (Drs Crowe and Kim and Mss Patrick and Baynes) and Plastic Surgery (Drs Yetman and Banbury), The Cleveland Clinic Breast Center, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.


RELATED ARTICLE

This Month in Archives of Surgery
Arch Surg. 2004;139(2):127.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Technical Considerations in Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: 82 Consecutive Cases without Necrosis
Stolier et al.
Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2008;15:1341-1347.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Terminal Duct Lobular Units are Scarce in the Nipple: Implications for Prophylactic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: Terminal Duct Lobular Units in the Nipple
Stolier and Wang
Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2008;15:438-442.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Optimizing the Total Skin-Sparing Mastectomy
Wijayanayagam et al.
Arch Surg 2008;143:38-45.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.