You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 139 No. 2, February 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (17)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Gastrointestinal Diseases
 •Colorectal Surgery
 •Colon Cancer
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Racial Disparities in Rectal Cancer Treatment

A Population-Based Analysis

Arden M. Morris, MD, MPH; Kevin G. Billingsley, MD; Nancy N. Baxter, MD, PhD; Laura-Mae Baldwin, MD, MPH

Arch Surg. 2004;139:151-155.

Hypothesis  We hypothesized that there are significant racial disparities in delivery of care to rectal cancer patients. We examined differential surgical and radiation treatment for these patients and determined whether blacks were less likely than whites to undergo sphincter-sparing procedures, which are associated with a higher quality of life than sphincter-ablating procedures.

Design  Cross-sectional cohort study.

Patients and Setting  The Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database provided population-based data for rectal cancer patients who were diagnosed between 1988 and 1999, were older than 35 years, and had no prior colorectal or other pelvic cancer.

Main Outcome Measures  Using logistic regression, we compared receipt and type of surgical therapy and radiation therapy, controlling for age, sex, year, geography, stage, and anatomic location.

Results  Among 52 864 patients, 3851 were black and 44 010 were white. Blacks were younger than whites and had more advanced disease (P<.001). Among patients who underwent operation, rates of sphincter-ablating procedure were 37% for whites and 43% for blacks (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.23-1.65). Moreover, 53% of whites and 56% of blacks received no radiation therapy for stage II to III disease (AOR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.15-1.47).

Conclusions  Blacks with rectal cancer were diagnosed at a younger age and more advanced disease stage than whites, implying a need for more aggressive screening. After adjusting for stage and other covariates, surgical and radiation treatment also differed along racial lines. Our data suggest that treatment disparities may contribute to differences in outcome among racial/ethnic groups with rectal cancer, and they highlight the need for improving access to state-of-the-art surgical care for minority patients with rectal cancer.


From the Department of Surgery, Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (Drs Morris and Baxter); and the Departments of Surgery (Dr Billingsley) and Family Practice (Dr Baldwin), University of Washington, Seattle.


RELATED ARTICLE

Racial Disparities in Rectal Cancer Treatment—Invited Critique
Michael J. Stamos
Arch Surg. 2004;139(2):156.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Effects of Socioeconomic Status and Treatment Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Survival
Le et al.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2008;17:1950-1962.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Survival After Resection of Ampullary Carcinoma: A National Population-Based Study
O'Connell et al.
Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2008;15:1820-1827.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anal Canal: Utilization and Outcomes of Recommended Treatment in the United States
Bilimoria et al.
Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2008;15:1948-1958.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Racial Disparities in Treatment and Survival of Male Breast Cancer
Crew et al.
JCO 2007;25:1089-1098.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Telephone Outreach to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening in an Urban Minority Population
Basch et al.
Am. J. Public Health 2006;96:2246-2253.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.