You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 139 No. 2, February 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Review Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (13)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Surgery, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Augmented Reality in Surgery

Jeffrey H. Shuhaiber, MD

Arch Surg. 2004;139:170-174.

Objective  To evaluate the history and current knowledge of computer-augmented reality in the field of surgery and its potential goals in education, surgeon training, and patient treatment.

Data Sources  National Library of Medicine's database and additional library searches.

Study Selection  Only articles suited to surgical sciences with a well-defined aim of study, methodology, and precise description of outcome were included.

Data Synthesis  Augmented reality is an effective tool in executing surgical procedures requiring low-performance surgical dexterity; it remains a science determined mainly by stereotactic registration and ergonomics. Strong evidence was found that it is an effective teaching tool for training residents. Weaker evidence was found to suggest a significant influence on surgical outcome, both morbidity and mortality. No evidence of cost-effectiveness was found.

Conclusions  Augmented reality is a new approach in executing detailed surgical operations. Although its application is in a preliminary stage, further research is needed to evaluate its long-term clinical impact on patients, surgeons, and hospital administrators. Its widespread use and the universal transfer of such technology remains limited until there is a better understanding of registration and ergonomics.


From the Department of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

This Month in Archives of Surgery
Arch Surg. 2004;139(2):127.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Current options and outcomes for the management of atrioventricular septal defect
Shuhaiber et al.
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2009;35:891-900.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Augmented-Reality-Assisted Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy
Marescaux et al.
JAMA 2004;292:2214-2215.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.