You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 139 No. 3, March 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Surgical Interventions, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Anatomic Classification System for Surgical Management of Paraspinal Tumors

Austin L. Spitzer, MD; Christopher M. Ceraldi, MD; To-Nao Wang, MD; Steven G. Granelli, MD

Arch Surg. 2004;139:262-269.

Hypothesis  An anatomic classification system for paraspinal tumors that identifies complexity of regional anatomy, morbidity in complete or partial resection of anatomic structures, and potential complications may assist surgeons in preoperative planning.

Design  Application of a 6-level anatomic classification system for paraspinal tumors by retrospective medical record analysis. The classification system is defined by the following divisions of the vertebral column: I (C3-T3), II (T3-T10), III (T10-L2), IV (L1-L5, anterior to spine), V (L2-L5, lateral to spine), and VI (S1-S5).

Patients  All patients seen by us who underwent paraspinal tumor resection between 1997 and 2002.

Setting  Tertiary referral facility.

Main Outcome Measures  Level-specific preoperative and surgical procedures and expected and unexpected vascular and neurologic morbidity caused by surgical intervention.

Results  Twenty-six patients met the inclusion criteria, and each of the levels (I through VI) of the classification system was represented by at least 2 patients. Expected morbidity that occurred because of surgical intervention included laryngeal paralysis in 1 patient with a level I tumor, femoral nerve palsy in 1 patient with a level V tumor, and neurogenic bladder and rectal dysfunction in 2 patients with level VI tumors. No unexpected neurologic deficit developed in any patient. Unanticipated intestinal ischemia and infarction occurred in 1 patient, who died after undergoing level IV surgery. Follow-up period ranged from 3 months to more than 5 years.

Conclusion  Application of this 6-level anatomic classification system based on paraspinal tumor location may allow surgeons to anticipate specific surgical problems and to evaluate risks of resection and potential complications on the basis of regional anatomy.


From the Department of Surgery, Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, Oakland, Calif, and the University of California, San Francisco–East Bay General Surgery Residency Program.


RELATED ARTICLE

This Month in Archives of Surgery
Arch Surg. 2004;139(3):239.
FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.