You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 139 No. 3, March 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (27)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Endocrine Surgery
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Pancreaticogastrostomy Decreased Relaparotomy Caused by Pancreatic Fistula After Pancreaticoduodenectomy Compared With Pancreaticojejunostomy

Elie Oussoultzoglou, MD; Philippe Bachellier, MD; Jean-Marc Bigourdan, MD; Jean-Christophe Weber, MD, PhD; Hiroshi Nakano, MD, PhD; Daniel Jaeck, MD, PhD, FRCS

Arch Surg. 2004;139:327-335.

Hypothesis  Pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) is associated with a lower relaparotomy rate following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) than pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ).

Design  Retrospective clinical trial.

Setting  Department of digestive surgery and transplantation.

Patients  Between 1987 and 2001, 250 consecutive patients underwent PD in our institution. Among them, 83 patients underwent PJ and 167, PG.

Main Outcome Measures  Preoperative clinicopathological features, intraoperative parameters, in-hospital mortality, postoperative morbidity, pancreatic fistula (PF), relaparotomy rates, and length of hospital stay were analyzed and compared between 2 reconstructive methods, PJ and PG, after PD.

Results  The morbidity rate, including PF, was lower in the PG group (38.3%) than in the PJ group (53.0%; P = .02). The mortality rate did not differ between the PG group (2.9%) and PJ group (2.4%). Conversely, the incidence of PF and the mean ± SD length of hospital stay were significantly lower in the PG group (2.3% and 17.2 ± 7.7 days) than in the PJ group (20.4% and 23.3 ± 11.7 days; P<.001 for both variables). Moreover, the overall relaparotomy rate was significantly lower in the PG group (4.7%) than in the PJ group (18.0%; P = .001). Nine (52.9%) of 17 patients with PF in the PJ group underwent relaparotomy. These 9 patients underwent subsequent completion pancreatectomy (n = 7) or removal of peripancreatic necrotized tissue (n = 2) with a postoperative mortality rate of 22.2%. However, no patient required relaparotomy for PF in the PG group because medical therapy succeeded in all 4 patients with PF. Moreover, no mortality related to PF occurred in the PG group.

Conclusion  The PG procedure is a safe method of reconstruction after PD, with a significantly lower rate of PF and relaparotomy.


From the Centre de Chirurgie Viscérale et de Transplantation, Hôpital Universitaire de Hautepierre, Strasbourg, Strasbourg Cedex, France.


RELATED ARTICLE

This Month in Archives of Surgery
Arch Surg. 2004;139(3):239.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Pancreatogastrostomy as a Salvage Procedure to Treat Severe Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula After Pancreatoduodenectomy
Bachellier et al.
Arch Surg 2008;143:966-970.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Significance of the Depth of Portal Vein Wall Invasion After Curative Resection for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
Fukuda et al.
Arch Surg 2007;142:172-179.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Critical Analysis of a Large Series of Pancreaticogastrostomy After Pancreaticoduodenectomy
Aranha et al.
Arch Surg 2006;141:574-580.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.