 |
 |

An Epidemic of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Soft Tissue Infections Among Medically Underserved Patients
David M. Young, MD;
Hobart W. Harris, MD, MPH;
Edwin D. Charlebois, MPH, PhD;
Henry Chambers, MD;
Andre Campbell, MD;
Françoise Perdreau-Remington, PhD;
Chen Lee, MD;
Mahesh Mankani, MD;
Robert Mackersie, MD;
William P. Schecter, MD
Arch Surg. 2004;139:947-953.
Hypothesis A high prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in soft tissue infections presents a treatment challenge.
Design Retrospective analysis.
Setting The San Francisco General Hospital Integrated Soft Tissue Infection (ISIS) Clinic.
Patients Patients treated at the ISIS Clinic from July 1, 2000, to June 30, 2003.
Main Outcome Measures Information on patient demographics, surgical procedures, microbiologic studies, and antibiotic treatments was obtained for all patients treated in the ISIS Clinic. Microbial data and antibiotic susceptibility pattern of S aureus, treatment outcome, and antibiotic prescribed were analyzed for all evaluable patients.
Results The ISIS Clinic treated 6156 unique patients for 12 012 episodes of infection. In this cohort, 5164 (84%) were either homeless or had no health insurance. More than half of the patients (58%) were injection drug users, but most had only 1 prior visit to the clinic (62%). Patients underwent a surgical procedure 7707 times (64%). Of the 837 positive cultures obtained, S aureus was recovered 695 times (83%), and 525 (63%) of the cultures contained MRSA. Therefore, a full 76% of all S aureus isolated was MRSA. In a subset analysis of 622 cultures collected prospectively from consecutive patients, 282 (45%) grew organisms, of which 256 (91%) were S aureus. MRSA represented 59% of all S aureus isolated. Homelessness and injection drug use were risk factors for infection by S aureus and MRSA. In another subgroup of patients with soft tissue infections that required admission to the hospital, MRSA was recovered from the cultures in 149 patients. In these patients with MRSA, 44 (30%) only received a -lactam antibiotic, inactive against MRSA, and had full resolution of their infection.
Conclusions The prevalence of MRSA soft tissue infections in the medically underserved ISIS Clinic cohort is extremely high. The transmission of the MRSA seems to be in the community. Antibiotic therapy directed at MRSA may not be needed in a large number of patients with these soft tissue infections. Studies to identify the source and cause of this MRSA outbreak are urgently needed. Clinical trials to examine the need for antibiotic therapy in soft tissue infections should be conducted.
From the Department of Surgery, San Francisco General Hospital, University of California, San Francisco (Drs Young, Harris, Campbell, Mankani, Mackersie, and Schecter); Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Epidemiology, and Prevention, Interventions Center, San Francisco General Hospital, University of California, San Francisco (Drs Charlebois, Chambers, and Perdreau-Remington); and Department of Surgery, McGill University School of Medicine, Montreal, Quebec (Dr Lee).
RELATED ARTICLE
This Month in Archives of Surgery
Arch Surg. 2004;139(9):929.
FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
 |
Community-Acquired Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Among Patients With Puerperal Mastitis Requiring Hospitalization
Stafford et al.
Obstet Gynecol 2008;112:533-537.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus as a Common Cause of Vulvar Abscesses
Thurman et al.
Obstet Gynecol 2008;112:538-544.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
National Trends in Ambulatory Visits and Antibiotic Prescribing for Skin and Soft-Tissue Infections
Hersh et al.
Arch Intern Med 2008;168:1585-1591.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Cephalexin for Treatment of Uncomplicated Skin Abscesses in a Population at Risk for Community-Acquired Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infection
Rajendran et al.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2007;51:4044-4048.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Evidence-based approach to abscess management
Korownyk and Allan
cfp 2007;53:1680-1684.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Tetracyclines as an Oral Treatment Option for Patients with Community Onset Skin and Soft Tissue Infections Caused by Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
Ruhe and Menon
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2007;51:3298-3303.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infection or Colonization Present at Hospital Admission: Multivariable Risk Factor Screening To Increase Efficiency of Surveillance Culturing
Haley et al.
J. Clin. Microbiol. 2007;45:3031-3038.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Skin and Soft-Tissue Infections Caused by Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
Daum
NEJM 2007;357:380-390.
FULL TEXT
Treatment and Outcomes of Infections by Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus at an Ambulatory Clinic
Szumowski et al.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2007;51:423-428.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Necrotizing Pneumonia Arising From an Infected Episiotomy Site
Rotas et al.
Obstet Gynecol 2007;109:533-536.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Inappropriate Antibiotic Use in Soft Tissue Infections
Paydar et al.
Arch Surg 2006;141:850-856.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Outbreak in Alberta of community-acquired (USA300) methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in people with a history of drug use, homelessness or incarceration
Gilbert et al.
CMAJ 2006;175:149-154.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
MRSA Outnumbers MSSA for Common Skin Infections Acquired in the Community
Robbins
AAP Grand Rounds 2006;16:77-78.
FULL TEXT
Emergence of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus USA 300 clone as the predominant cause of skin and soft-tissue infections.
King et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2006;144:309-317.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Clinical Presentation of Community-Acquired Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Pregnancy
Laibl et al.
Obstet Gynecol 2005;106:461-465.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Community-Associated MRSA -- Resistance and Virulence Converge
Chambers
NEJM 2005;352:1485-1487.
FULL TEXT
|