You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 140 No. 1, January 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (17)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Surgery, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Characterizing the General Surgery Workforce in Rural America

Matthew J. Thompson, MBChB; Dana Christian Lynge, MD; Eric H. Larson, PhD; Pantipa Tachawachira, PhC; L. Gary Hart, PhD

Arch Surg. 2005;140:74-79.

Background  General surgeons form a crucial component of the medical workforce in rural areas of the United States. Any decline in their numbers could have profound effects on access to adequate health care in such areas.

Hypothesis  We hypothesize that the rural areas of the United States are relatively undersupplied with general surgeons.

Design and Setting  The American Medical Association’s Physician Masterfile was used to identify all clinically active general surgeons as well as their locations and characteristics. Their geographic distribution was examined using the ZIP code version of the Rural-Urban Commuting Areas. Surgeons were classified as practicing in urban areas, large rural areas, or small/isolated rural areas.

Results  There are currently 17 243 general surgeons practicing in the United States. Nationally, the number of general surgeons per population of 100 000 varies from 6.53 in urban areas to 7.71 in large rural areas and 4.67 in small/isolated rural areas. Only 10.6% of the nation’s general surgeons are female. Wide variations in numbers of general surgeons were found between and within individual states. General surgeons in the smallest rural areas are more likely than those in urban areas to be male (92.7% vs 88.3%, P<.001), 50 years of age or older (51.6% vs 42.1%, P<.001), or international medical graduates (25.2% vs 20.1%, P<.001).

Conclusions  The overall size of the rural general surgical workforce has remained static over the last decade, but its demographic characteristics suggest that numbers will decline. Many rural residents have limited access to surgical services. Steps to reverse this trend are needed to preserve the viability of health care in many parts of rural America.


Author Affiliations: Departments of Family Medicine (Drs Thompson, Lynge, Larson, and Hart) and Surgery (Dr Lynge), Washington, Wyoming, Alaska, Montana, Idaho (WWAMI) Rural Health Research Center (Drs Larson and Hart), and School of Business Administration (Ms Tachawachira), University of Washington, Seattle. Dr Thompson is currently affiliated with the Department of Primary Health Care, University of Oxford, Oxford, England.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Whither Goest General Surgery?
Welch
Arch Surg 2008;143:444-450.
FULL TEXT  

A Longitudinal Analysis of the General Surgery Workforce in the United States, 1981-2005
Christian Lynge et al.
Arch Surg 2008;143:345-350.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Surgery in Rural America
Finlayson
SURG INNOV 2005;12:299-305.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.