You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 140 No. 10, October 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (5)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Hepatobiliary Surgery
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Liver Resection for Intrahepatic Stones

Moon-Tong Cheung, FRCS, FHKAM; Philip Chong-Hei Kwok, FRCR, FHKAM

Arch Surg. 2005;140:993-997.

Hypothesis  Long-term outcome is good for a selected group of patients with hepatolithiasis treated with liver resection. Liver resection should also be offered to patients with complex hepatolithiasis such as bilateral stones or those with strictures.

Design  Retrospective study.

Setting  Regional hospital.

Patients  A total of 174 patients with hepatolithiasis (201 procedures) treated between January 1, 1989, and September 30, 2003.

Interventions  Liver resection (52 procedures) or removal of stones primarily by percutaneous choledochoscopy (149 procedures).

Main Outcome Measure  Recurrence of cholangitis.

Results  Most patients in the liver resection group had stones localized to the left side. The overall success rate in this group was 98.0% (49 of 50 patients, excluding 2 patients found to have cholangiocarcinoma). The chance of biliary sepsis at 5 years after resection was 13.3%. The overall success rate of stone removal primarily by percutaneous choledochoscopy was 70.5%. The bilaterality of stones, the presence of stricture, and the presence of atrophy were found to be significant risk factors for a poor long-term outcome after stone removal alone. The chance of biliary sepsis at 5 years was 26.4% and 43.2% for those without and with stricture, respectively.

Conclusions  The long-term outcome after liver resection for hepatolithiasis was excellent for a selected group of patients. Poor outcomes were recorded for patients whose intrahepatic stones were removed primarily by percutaneous choledochoscopy, especially those with strictures. The indication for liver resection for hepatolithiasis should be extended to patients with strictures and those with bilateral stones. A combination of different treatment modalities is necessary to improve the outcome of these patients.


Author Affiliations: Departments of Surgery (Dr Cheung) and Radiology and Imaging (Dr Kwok), Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong.


RELATED LETTERS

Liver Resection for Complicated Hepatolithiasis
J. E. J. Krige and S. J. Beningfield
Arch Surg. 2006;141(7):713-714.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Liver Resection for Complicated Hepatolithiasis—Reply
Moon-Tong Cheung and Philip Chong-Hei Kwok
Arch Surg. 2006;141(7):714.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Liver Resection for Primary Intrahepatic Stones: A Single-Center Experience
Nuzzo et al.
Arch Surg 2008;143:570-573.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Liver Resection for Complicated Hepatolithiasis
Krige and Beningfield
Arch Surg 2006;141:713-714.
FULL TEXT  

Liver Resection for Complicated Hepatolithiasis--Reply
Cheung and Kwok
Arch Surg 2006;141:714-714.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.