You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 140 No. 3, March 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (23)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Colon Cancer
 •Colorectal Surgery
 •Randomized Controlled Trial
 •Gastrointestinal Diseases
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Is Mechanical Bowel Preparation Mandatory for Elective Colon Surgery?

A Prospective Randomized Study

Edward Ram, MD; Yevgeni Sherman, MD; Ruben Weil, MD; Tali Vishne, MD; Dragan Kravarusic, MD; Zeev Dreznik, MD

Arch Surg. 2005;140:285-288.

Background  Bowel preparation prior to colonic surgery usually includes antibiotic therapy together with mechanical bowel preparation (MBP). Mechanical bowel preparation may cause discomfort to the patient, prolonged hospitalization, and water and electrolyte imbalance. It was assumed that with the improvement in surgical technique together with the use of more effective prophylactic antibiotics, it was possible that MBP would no longer be necessary.

Hypothesis  There is no statistical difference in the postoperative results of patients who undergo elective colon resection with MBP as compared with those who have no MBP.

Design and Patients  The study includes all patients who had elective large bowel resection at Campus Golda between April 1, 1999, and March 31, 2002. Emergency operations were not included. The patients were randomly assigned to the 2 study groups (with or without MBP) according to identification numbers. All patients were treated with intravenous and oral antibiotics prior to surgery. The patients in the MBP group received Soffodex for bowel preparation.

Results  A total of 329 patients participated in the study, 165 without MBP and 164 with MBP. The 2 groups were similar in age, sex, and type of surgical procedure. Two hundred sixty-eight patients (81.5%) underwent surgery owing to colorectal cancer and 61 patients (18.5%) owing to benign disease. The hospitalization period was longer in the bowel-prepared group (mean ± SD, 8.2 ± 5.1 days) as compared with the nonprepared group (mean ± SD, 8.0 ± 2.7 days). However, this difference was not statistically significant. The time until the first bowel movement was similar between the 2 groups: a mean ± SD of 4.2 ± 1.3 days in the nonprepared group as compared with a mean ± SD of 4.3 ± 1.1 days in the prepared group (P = NS). Four patients (1.2%) died in the postoperative course owing to acute myocardial infarction and pulmonary embolism. Sixty-two patients (37.6%) of the non-MBP group suffered from postoperative complications as compared with 77 patients (46.9%) of the MBP group.

Conclusion  Our results suggest that no advantage is gained by preoperative MBP in elective colorectal surgery.


Author Affiliations: Division of General Surgery, Rabin Medical Center, Campus Golda, Petach Tikva Sackler Medical School, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.


RELATED ARTICLE

This Month in Archives of Surgery
Arch Surg. 2005;140(3):223.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Povidone-Iodine vs Sodium Hypochlorite Enema for Mechanical Preparation Before Elective Open Colonic or Rectal Resection With Primary Anastomosis--Invited Critique
Galandiuk
Arch Surg 2006;141:1175-1175.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.