You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 140 No. 3, March 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (7)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Surgery, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Synchronized Video and Motion Analysis for the Assessment of Procedures in the Operating Theater

Aristotelis Dosis, MSc; Rajesh Aggarwal, MRCS, Eng; Fernando Bello, PhD; Krishna Moorthy, MD; Yaron Munz, MD; Duncan Gillies, PhD; Ara Darzi, MD

Arch Surg. 2005;140:293-299.

Hypothesis  Objective assessment of surgical skill has recently been shown to be possible through the use of dexterity-based and video analysis systems. The aim of this study was to synchronize these 2 modalities to produce a comprehensive surgical assessment tool.

Design  The Imperial College Surgical Assessment Device is a dexterity-based motion analysis device that has been developed in the Department of Surgical Oncology and Technology by the Surgical Computing and Imaging Research Group. Further advances to this system have been made to enable synchronized acquisition of hand kinematics and video from real procedures, and their concurrent analysis. To test the feasibility of the system, 10 laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed by 5 different surgeons on consenting patients were recorded. Analysis focused on the entire procedure and also on specific parts of the operation such as the clipping and cutting of the cystic duct and artery.

Results  Dexterity analysis was performed using the objective measures of time, path length, number of movements, velocities, and trajectories. Comparative analysis of a surgeon’s dexterity was carried out on the whole procedure and by using the synchronized zoom facility in the software. Kinematic signals revealed rapid changes in velocity caused by alternating between different instruments or occurring after complications such as bleeding.

Conclusion  This new motion analysis system has been shown to be an effective tool for the comprehensive assessment of operative procedures.


Author Affiliations: Surgical Computing and Imaging Research Group, Department of Surgical Oncology and Technology, Imperial College, London, St Mary’s Hospital, London, United Kingdom.


RELATED ARTICLE

This Month in Archives of Surgery
Arch Surg. 2005;140(3):223.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

A Simple, Low-Cost Platform for Basic Laparoscopic Skills Training
Dayan et al.
SURG INNOV 2008;15:136-142.
ABSTRACT  

Methodological Infrastructure in Surgical Ergonomics: A Review of Tasks, Models, and Measurement Systems
Lee et al.
SURG INNOV 2007;14:153-167.
ABSTRACT  

Assessing Technical Skill in Surgery and Endoscopy: A Set of Metrics and an Algorithm (C-PASS) to Assess Skills in Surgical and Endoscopic Procedures
Stylopoulos and Vosburgh
SURG INNOV 2007;14:113-121.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.