You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 140 No. 5, May 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Paper
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on ISI (4)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Endoscopy/ Minimally Invasive Surgery
 •Hepatobiliary Surgery
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Surgical Sphincteroplasty in 446 Patients

James A. Madura, MD; James A. Madura II, MD; Stuart Sherman, MD; Glen A. Lehman, MD

Arch Surg. 2005;140:504-512.

Hypothesis  Pancreaticobiliary sphincter disease is reliably diagnosed by endoscopic and intraoperative manometry.

Design  Retrospective review of prospectively collected data.

Setting  A 400-bed urban university hospital.

Patients  Between May 1, 1978, and March 27, 2002, 446 patients were treated surgically for dysfunction of the pancreaticobiliary sphincters. There were 376 females and 70 males (mean ± SD age, 41.6 ± 12.5 years). There were 372 patients with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction, and 74 with pancreas divisum. Symptoms included abdominal pain (100.0%), nausea/vomiting (80.5%), back pain (57.2%), and pancreatitis (22.4%).

Interventions  Perfusion manometry has evolved as the gold standard for diagnosis, and intraoperative manometry was done in 214 patients. All patients underwent transduodenal sphincteroplasty and biopsies of the ampullae and transampullar septa.

Results  Excellent or good results were seen in 86.8% of the patients with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction and in 63.5% of the patients with pancreas divisum. Common duct and sphincter of Oddi pressures were 0 mm Hg in all patients after sphincteroplasty. Pancreatic duct and pancreatic sphincter manometry results were improved in 82.4% of the patients. Biopsy results of the main and accessory sphincters demonstrated inflammation and/or fibrosis in 33.9% of ampullae and 43.5% of transampullar septa, but this did not correlate with outcome. There was 1 death from a duodenal leak. Complications occurred in 34.8% of patients, with pancreatitis (8.8%), asymptomatic hyperamylasemia (6.0%), and wound/abdominal infection (7.1%) the most common. Predictive factors for good outcome were reduction in pancreatic duct and sphincter pressures following sphincteroplasty.

Conclusion  Good to excellent results may be achieved by surgical sphincteroplasty when careful patient selection by manometry is used.


Author Affiliations: Departments of Surgery (Drs J. A. Madura and J. A. Madura II) and Medicine (Drs Sherman and Lehman), The Indiana University Medical Center, Indianapolis.


RELATED ARTICLE

Surgical Sphincteroplasty in 446 Patients—Invited Critique
Andrew L. Warshaw
Arch Surg. 2005;140(5):513.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.