This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on ISI (6)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related letters  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Medical Education  • End-of-life Care/ Palliative Medicine  • Surgical Oncology  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Joseph M. Galante, MD; Tawnya L. Bowles, MD; Vijay P. Khatri, MD; Philip D. Schneider, MD, PhD; James E. Goodnight, Jr, MD, PhD; Richard J. Bold, MD

Arch Surg. 2005;140:873-880.

Background  Surgery can effectively palliate symptoms in patients with advanced malignancy and thereby maintain quality of life. However, the goal of surgical palliation should be balanced with the associated risks, and the decision to operate can be challenging for even the most experienced surgeon.

Hypothesis  There are significant deficiencies in training during residency and in continuing medical education in palliative surgical care leading to a lack of agreement for treatment recommendations.

Design and Setting  A survey of general surgeons involving 4 clinical vignettes of patients with advanced malignancies and varying degrees of symptoms. Respondents were asked to select the best treatment option for each patient from a list of 6 alternatives. Furthermore, respondents identified the clinical factors that most influenced the decision, as well as the major goal of the palliative intervention.

Subjects  Surgeons in a midsized urban setting and its surrounding region.

Results  Of 124 surveys sent out, 70 (56%) were completed. Significant deficiencies in education were identified; 59 (84%) of the respondents did not receive any education in palliative surgical care during residency and 28 (44%) lacked continuing medical education. A consensus treatment recommendation was not selected in 3 of the 4 clinical vignettes, but the respondents used similar clinical factors and goals of treatment for selection of the specific recommendation.

Conclusions  Palliative care is a major deficiency of postgraduate surgical training. A more focused effort in training surgeons in palliative care may allow for the more uniform and standard provision of palliative surgical care to patients with advanced cancer.

Author Affiliations: Department of Surgery, University of California, Davis, Medical Center, Sacramento, Calif.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati     What's this?

RELATED LETTERS

Family Physicians' Training Programs Are Useful for Surgeons
Patrick J. P. Poels, Tim olde Hartman, and Chris van Weel
Arch Surg. 2006;141(5):515.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Family Physicians' Training Programs Are Useful for Surgeons—Reply
Joseph Galante and Richard J. Bold
Arch Surg. 2006;141(5):515.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Review Article: Goals of Care Toward the End of Life: A Structured Literature Review
Kaldjian et al.
AM J HOSP PALLIAT CARE 2009;25:501-511.
ABSTRACT  

Teaching Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues: A Core Curriculum for Surgical Residents
Klaristenfeld et al.
Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2007;14:1801-1806.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Surgeon and Palliative Care
Podnos and Wagman
Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2007;14:1257-1263.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Family Physicians' Training Programs Are Useful for Surgeons
Poels et al.
Arch Surg 2006;141:515-515.
FULL TEXT  

Family Physicians' Training Programs Are Useful for Surgeons--Reply
Galante and Bold
Arch Surg 2006;141:515-515.
FULL TEXT