You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 140 No. 9, September 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Paper
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (5)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Liver/ Biliary Tract/ Pancreatic Diseases
 •Liver Transplantation
 •Transplantation, Other
 •Hepatobiliary Surgery
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Morbidity in Live Liver Donors

Standards-Based Adverse Event Reporting Further Refined

Christopher R. Shackleton, MD; John M. Vierling, MD; Nicholas Nissen, MD; Paul Martin, MD; Fred Poordad, MD; Tram Tran, MD; Steven D. Colquhoun, MD

Arch Surg. 2005;140:888-895.

Hypothesis  The true extent of morbidity among live liver donors remains poorly understood. In this unique and often high-profile area of surgery, the development of standards for defining and reporting complications would foster a better understanding of the incidence and magnitude of such adverse events (AEs).

Design  Retrospective review of AEs among live liver donors.

Setting  University-affiliated teaching hospital.

Patients and Methods  Of 202 individuals undergoing evaluation for live liver donation, 42 (20.8%) proceeded to surgery. Thirty-four underwent a right lobectomy without the middle hepatic vein; 3, a left lateral segmentectomy. Any event causing a deviation from a patient’s ideal course was considered an AE and subsequently classified according to a derived framework. Morbidity was defined as 1 or more AEs.

Main Outcome Measures  Incidence, timing, type, severity, and impact of AEs.

Results  No deaths or significant hepatic dysfunction occurred. In 5 (12%) of the 42 donors, the hepatectomy was aborted for anatomic reasons before parenchymal transection. Eight (22%) of the remaining 37 experienced 11 AEs, of which 10 completely resolved, whereas 1 AE (3%) resulted in a permanent disability (brachial plexopathy). The overall incidence of AEs was 0.30 per case. Ten (91%) of the 11 AEs presented within the first postoperative month.

Conclusions  Most live liver donations are uncomplicated or do not lead to permanent consequence. The adoption of a standards-based classification framework for AEs in live liver donors would allow for an inclusive, consistent, and universally applicable method to collect, analyze, and report donor morbidity.


Author Affiliations: Center for Liver Diseases and Transplantation, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (Drs Shackleton, Vierling, Nissen, Martin, Poordad, Tran, and Colquhoun), and Departments of Surgery (Drs Shackleton, Nissen, and Colquhoun) and Medicine (Drs Vierling, Martin, Poordad, and Tran), The David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, Calif.


RELATED ARTICLE

Morbidity in Live Liver Donors—Invited Critique
Susan L. Orloff
Arch Surg. 2005;140(9):896.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Right Hepatectomy for Living Liver Donation vs Right Hepatectomy for Disease: Intraoperative and Immediate Postoperative Comparison
Gali et al.
Arch Surg 2007;142:467-472.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.