You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 141 No. 1, January 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Special Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (6)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letter
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Surgery, Other
 •Medical Ethics
 •Patient-Physician Communication
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Patient-Centered Informed Consent in Surgical Practice

James L. Bernat, MD; Lynn M. Peterson, MD

Arch Surg. 2006;141:86-92.

Objectives  To review the medical, ethical, and legal basis of the doctrine of informed consent for surgery and its complications, particularly for an incapacitated patient who requires a surrogate decision maker; to discuss the elasticity of the consent doctrine, whether surgical consent encompasses consent for surgical complications, and emphasize the importance of communication and shared decision making in the context of the patient-surgeon relationship; and to discuss patient and surrogate refusal of treatment, standards of surrogate decision making, barriers to effective communication, the role of the hospital ethics committee in resolving disputes over treatment, and how to reconceptualize surgical consent in the context of patient-centered medicine.

Data Sources  We reviewed PubMed citations for informed consent in surgery, patient-physician communication, shared decision making, patient-centered medicine, and consent guidelines published by specialty societies, particularly the American College of Surgeons and the Society for Critical Care Medicine.

Study Selection  We selected articles in which issues of consent for surgical treatment were discussed or measured.

Data Extraction  We extracted data relevant to questions of consent in surgical practice.

Data Synthesis  We studied qualitative aspects of the consent doctrine.

Conclusions  Surgical consent is not an event or a signature on a form but is an ongoing process of communication that continues throughout preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative care. In the context of patient-centered medicine, consent is best conceptualized as shared decision making with patients or their surrogates.


Author Affiliations: Department of Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, NH (Dr Bernat); and Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (Dr Peterson).


RELATED LETTER

Patient-Physician Communication Using Consent Forms
David Goldblatt
Arch Surg. 2006;141(7):715.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Informed Patient Choice: Patient-Centered Valuing Of Surgical Risks And Benefits
Weinstein et al.
Health Aff (Millwood) 2007;26:726-730.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Patient-Physician Communication Using Consent Forms
Goldblatt
Arch Surg 2006;141:715-715.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2006 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.