You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 141 No. 12, December 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (5)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Oncology, Other
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Liver/ Biliary Tract/ Pancreatic Diseases
 •Infectious Diseases
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

Comparable Survival in Patients With Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated by Radiofrequency Ablation or Transarterial Chemoembolization

Kenneth S. Chok, MBBS; Kelvin K. Ng, PhD; Ronnie T. P. Poon, MS; Chi Ming Lam, MS; Jimmy Yuen, MBBS; Wai Kuen Tso, MBBS; Sheung Tat Fan, MS, MD, PhD

Arch Surg. 2006;141:1231-1236.

Hypothesis  The survival benefits of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) are similar for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma amenable to either treatment.

Design  Retrospective comparative study.

Setting  Tertiary care institution.

Patients  From February 22, 2001, to March 10, 2004, 91 patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (tumor diameter <5 cm and <4 tumor nodules) treated by either TACE or RFA were analyzed from a prospective database.

Main Outcome Measures  The treatment-related morbidity, mortality, overall survival, and time to disease progression.

Results  Forty patients received TACE and 51 patients received RFA during the study period. Demographic data were comparable in both groups of patients. The treatment-related morbidities of TACE and RFA were 10% and 28%, respectively (P = .04). There was no treatment-related mortality in either group. There was 1 patient (2%) with complete tumor remission in the TACE group, and the complete ablation rate in the RFA group was 96%. The time to disease progression was similar in both groups (P = .95). The overall survival rates at 1 and 2 years were 80% and 58%, respectively, in the TACE group and 82% and 72%, respectively, in the RFA group (P = .21).

Conclusions  The overall survival and time for disease progression were similar in both groups of patients. In terms of the survival result, the efficacies of RFA and TACE were comparable for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.


Author Affiliations: Departments of Surgery (Drs Chok, Ng, Poon, Lam, and Fan) and Radiology (Drs Yuen and Tso), Centre for the Study of Liver Disease, University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Intraoperative Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Long-Term Results in a Large Series
Kim et al.
Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2008;15:1862-1870.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2006 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.