You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 141 No. 4, April 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Paper
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (6)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Surgery, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

Maximizing Operating Room and Recovery Room Capacity in an Era of Constrained Resources

Suzanne M. Sokal, MSPH; David L. Craft, PhD; Yuchiao Chang, PhD; Warren S. Sandberg, MD, PhD; David L. Berger, MD

Arch Surg. 2006;141:389-395.

Hypothesis  Three parallel processing operating rooms (ORs) (concurrent induction and turnover) with a dedicated 3-bed mini–recovery room (mini–postanesthesia care unit [PACU]) will optimize patient throughput and main PACU workload when compared with 4 traditional ORs or 4 parallel processing ORs.

Design  Statistical and mathematical models projected the impact of parallel processing on case throughput and PACU use.

Setting  Academic medical center with 48 traditional ORs using serial induction and turnover and 1 experimental OR, the operating room of the future, with parallel processing.

Participants  All surgical cases from October 2002 through March 2004 (N = 49 887).

Interventions  A statistical model projected the duration of induction, surgery, turnover, and PACU stay for cases performed in a traditional OR (n = 48 667) based on the operating room of the future (n = 1220) experience. A fluid queuing model compared each combination using specific probability density functions.

Main Outcome Measures  Each OR configuration was evaluated for case throughput and minutes of work sent to the PACU.

Results  Although all cases save OR time with parallel processing, only select surgeon-case combinations translate time saved into additional cases per day (26%). Without additional PACU slots, output from 4 parallel processing ORs further stresses the PACU. Three parallel processing ORs and a mini-PACU balances incremental volume by offsetting PACU utilization in 84% of cases.

Conclusion  In a PACU-constrained environment, 3 parallel processing ORs with a mini-PACU configuration offers increased throughput and decreased PACU workload.


Author Affiliations: Center for Clinical Effectiveness in Surgery and Departments of Surgery (Drs Sokal and Berger), Radiation Oncology (Dr Craft), Medicine (Dr Chang), Anesthesia and Critical Care (Dr Sandberg), Massachusetts General Hospital, and Harvard Medical School (Drs Sandberg and Berger), Boston.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Patient Waiting Time Matters When Filling a Pod of Operating Rooms
Dexter and Wachtel
Arch Surg 2007;142:1114-1114.
FULL TEXT  

An Observational Study of Surgeons' Sequencing of Cases and Its Impact on Postanesthesia Care Unit and Holding Area Staffing Requirements at Hospitals
Marcon and Dexter
Anesth. Analg. 2007;105:119-126.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Assessing Technical Skill in Surgery and Endoscopy: A Set of Metrics and an Algorithm (C-PASS) to Assess Skills in Surgical and Endoscopic Procedures
Stylopoulos and Vosburgh
SURG INNOV 2007;14:113-121.
ABSTRACT  

Surgeon Profiling: A Key to Optimum Operating Room Use
Sokal et al.
Arch Surg 2007;142:365-370.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Effect of Direct-From-Recovery Room Discharge of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Patients on Recovery Room Workload
Seim et al.
SURG INNOV 2006;13:257-264.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2006 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.