You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 141 No. 5, May 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Paper
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (15)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Surgical Interventions, Other
 •Computed Tomography
 •Emergency Medicine
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Whole Body Imaging in Blunt Multisystem Trauma Patients Without Obvious Signs of Injury

Results of a Prospective Study

Ali Salim, MD; Burapat Sangthong, MD; Matthew Martin, MD; Carlos Brown, MD; David Plurad, MD; Demetrios Demetriades, MD

Arch Surg. 2006;141:468-475.

Hypothesis  The use of liberal whole body imaging (pan scan) in patients based on mechanism is warranted, even in evaluable patients with no obvious signs of chest or abdominal injury.

Design  Prospective observational study.

Setting  Academic level I trauma center.

Patients  All patients admitted following blunt multisystem trauma.

Intervention  Pan scan, including computed tomography (CT) of the head, cervical spine, chest, abdomen, and pelvis, with the following inclusion criteria: (1) no visible evidence of chest or abdominal injury, (2) hemodynamically stable, (3) normal abdominal examination results in a neurologically intact patient or unevaluable abdominal examination results secondary to a depressed level of consciousness, and (4) significant mechanisms of injury. Radiological findings and changes in treatment based on these findings were recorded.

Main Outcome Measure  Any alteration in the normal treatment plan as a direct result of CT scan findings. These alterations include early hospital discharge, admission for observation, operative intervention, and additional diagnostic studies or interventions.

Results  One thousand patients underwent pan scan during the 18-month observation period, of which 592 were evaluable patients with no obvious signs of abdominal injury. Clinically significant abnormalities were found in 3.5% of head CT scans, 5.1% of cervical spine CT scans, 19.6% of chest CT scans, and 7.1% of abdominal CT scans. Overall treatment was changed in 18.9% of patients based on abnormal CT scan findings.

Conclusions  The use of pan scan based on mechanism in awake, evaluable patients is warranted. Clinically significant abnormalities are not uncommon, resulting in a change in treatment in nearly 19% of patients.


Author Affiliations: Division of Trauma and Critical Care, Department of Surgery, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine and the Los Angeles County and University of Southern California Medical Center, Los Angeles.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Screening patients with multi-detector computed axial tomography (MDCT): when will we inform patients about the risk of radiation?
Baskerville
Emerg. Med. J. 2008;25:323-324.
FULL TEXT  

Added Value of Routine Chest MDCT After Blunt Trauma: Evaluation of Additional Findings and Impact on Patient Management
Brink et al.
Am. J. Roentgenol. 2008;190:1591-1598.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Investigation of blunt abdominal trauma
Jansen et al.
BMJ 2008;336:938-942.
FULL TEXT  

Case 10-2007 -- A 55-Year-Old Man Impaled in a Rowing Accident
Sheridan et al.
NEJM 2007;356:1353-1360.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2006 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.