You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 141 No. 8, August 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Paper
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •CME Course for This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (3)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Blood/ Coagulation
 •Randomized Controlled Trial
 •Thrombolysis
 •Venous Thromboembolism
 •Alert me on articles by topic

The Rate of Bleeding Complications After Pharmacologic Deep Venous Thrombosis Prophylaxis

A Systematic Review of 33 Randomized Controlled Trials

Michael J. Leonardi, MD; Marcia L. McGory, MD; Clifford Y. Ko, MD

Arch Surg. 2006;141:790-799.

Hypothesis  Major bleeding complications from pharmacologic deep venous thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis are infrequent.

Design  Systematic review of the MEDLINE database from 1965 to August 2005, using the terms DVT, prophylaxis, general surgery, and heparin.

Setting and Patients  Randomized controlled trials evaluating pharmacologic DVT prophylaxis in patients undergoing general surgery.

Main Outcome Measures  Eight complication categories: injection site bruising, wound hematoma, drain site bleeding, hematuria, gastrointestinal tract bleeding, retroperitoneal bleeding, discontinuation of prophylaxis, and subsequent operation.

Results  Fifty-two randomized controlled trials studied DVT prophylaxis; 33 randomized controlled trials with 33 813 patients undergoing general surgery evaluated pharmacologic prophylaxis and quantified bleeding complications. Of the minor complications, injection site bruising (6.9%), wound hematoma (5.7%), drain site bleeding (2.0%), and hematuria (1.6%) were most common. Major bleeding complications, such as gastrointestinal tract (0.2%) or retroperitoneal (<0.1%) bleeding, were infrequent. Discontinuation of prophylaxis occurred in 2.0% of patients and subsequent operation in less than 1% of patients. When analyzed by high- vs low-dose unfractionated heparin, the lower dose had a smaller rate of discontinuation of prophylaxis (P = .02) and subsequent operation (P = .06).

Conclusions  Knowledge of bleeding complication rates is important for surgeons because DVT prophylaxis may soon be implemented by Medicare as a quality measure. This level 1 evidence report shows that bleeding complications requiring a change in care occur less than 3% of the time and seem reduced with lower-dose prophylaxis. Given these findings, most patients undergoing general surgery could receive pharmacologic prophylaxis safely.


Author Affiliations: Departments of Surgery and UCLA Center for Surgical Outcomes and Quality, The David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA (Drs Leonardi, McGory, and Ko), and VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System (Dr Ko), Los Angeles, Calif.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Medication-Related Complications in the Trauma Patient
Corbett and Rebuck
J Intensive Care Med 2008;23:91-108.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2006 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.