You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 142 No. 12, December 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on ISI (1)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Surgical Interventions, Other
 •Hepatobiliary Surgery
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Comparison of Percutaneous and Surgical Approaches for Radiofrequency Ablation of Small and Medium Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Muhammad Rizwan Khan, MBBS; Ronnie T. P. Poon, MS; Kelvin K. Ng, PhD; Albert C. Chan, MBBS; Jimmy Yuen, MBBS; Helen Tung, MBBS; Jason Tsang, MBBS; Sheung Tat Fan, MS, MD, PhD, DSc

Arch Surg. 2007;142(12):1136-1143.

Hypothesis  Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can be performed by percutaneous or surgical approach. Tumor size is an important consideration while deciding the treatment approach.

Design  Case series with prospective data collection.

Setting  A tertiary referral center.

Patients  A total of 228 patients who underwent RFA of small (≤ 3 cm; n = 155) and medium (3.1-5 cm; n = 73) HCC by percutaneous or surgical approach.

Main Outcome Measures  Complete ablation rate, post-RFA complications, treatment-related mortality, and overall and disease-free survival.

Results  In patients with small HCC, the complete ablation rate was 95% with both approaches (P > .99). Complication rate (P < .001) and hospital stay (P < .001) were higher with the surgical approach. One-year and 3-year survival rates were 91% and 71%, respectively, in the percutaneous group, and 89% and 57%, respectively, in the surgical group (P = .30). In patients with medium HCC, the complete ablation rate was similar between the surgical and the percutaneous groups (92% vs 95%; P = .48), and the complication rate was also comparable (P = .17). The 1-year and 3-year survival rates were 92% and 68%, respectively, in the surgical group, significantly superior to the corresponding rates of 81% and 42% in the percutaneous group (P = .03).

Conclusions  In patients with small HCC, the percutaneous approach achieved similar tumor control with lower morbidity compared with the surgical approach and should be the preferred approach provided that tumor location is suitable. For medium HCC, the surgical approach seems to achieve better overall survival and may be a preferred option.


Author Affiliations: Departments of Surgery (Drs Khan, Ng, Chan, and Fan and Mr Poon) and Radiology (Drs Yuen, Tung, and Tsang), Centre for the Study of Liver Disease, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, China.


RELATED ARTICLE

Comparison of Percutaneous and Surgical Approaches for Radiofrequency Ablation of Small and Medium Hepatocellular Carcinoma—Invited Critique
Michael E. deVera, James W. Marsh, and T. Clark Gamblin
Arch Surg. 2007;142(12):1143.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2007 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.