You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 142 No. 12, December 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on ISI (2)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Liver/ Biliary Tract/ Pancreatic Diseases
 •Endocrine Surgery
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Timing of Surgical Intervention in Necrotizing Pancreatitis

Marc G. H. Besselink, MD; Thomas J. Verwer, MD; Ernst J. P. Schoenmaeckers, MD; Erik Buskens, MD, PhD; Ben U. Ridwan, MD; Maarten R. Visser, MD, PhD; Vincent B. Nieuwenhuijs, MD, PhD; Hein G. Gooszen, MD, PhD

Arch Surg. 2007;142(12):1194-1201.

Objective  To determine the effect of timing of surgical intervention for necrotizing pancreatitis.

Design  Retrospective study of 53 patients and a systematic review.

Setting  A tertiary referral center.

Main Outcome Measure  Mortality.

Results  Median timing of the intervention was 28 days. Eighty-three percent of patients had infected necrosis and 55% had preoperative organ failure. The mortality rate was 36%. Sixteen patients were operated on within 14 days of initial admission, 11 patients from day 15 to 29, and 26 patients on day 30 or later. This latter group received preoperative antibiotics for a longer period (P < .001), and Candida species and antibiotic-resistant organisms were more often cultured from the pancreatic or peripancreatic necrosis in these patients (P = .02). The 30-day group also had the lowest mortality (8% vs 75% in the 1 to 14–days group and 45% in the 15 to 29–days group, P < .001); this difference persisted when outcome was stratified for preoperative organ failure. During the second half of the study, necrosectomy was further postponed (43 vs 20 days, P = .06) and mortality decreased (22% vs 47%, P = .09). We also reviewed 11 studies with a total of 1136 patients. Median surgical patient volume was 8.3 patients per year (range, 5.3-15.6), median timing of surgical intervention was 26 days (range, 3-31), and median mortality was 25% (range, 6%-56%). We observed a significant correlation between timing of intervention and mortality (R = – 0.603; 95% confidence interval, – 2.10 to – 0.02; P = .05).

Conclusion  Postponing necrosectomy until 30 days after initial hospital admission is associated with decreased mortality, prolonged use of antibiotics, and increased incidence of Candida species and antibiotic-resistant organisms.


Author Affiliations: Departments of Surgery (Drs Besselink, Verwer, Schoenmaeckers, Nieuwenhuijs, and Gooszen) and Microbiology (Drs Ridwan and Visser), and Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (Dr Buskens), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2007 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.