This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on ISI (9)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related letters  • Related article  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Gastrointestinal/ Upper Foregut  • Thoracic Surgery  • Prognosis/ Outcomes  • Gastrointestinal Diseases  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Ioannis Rouvelas, MD; Mats Lindblad, MD, PhD; Wenyi Zeng, PhD; Pernilla Viklund, RN; Weimin Ye, MD, PhD; Jesper Lagergren, MD, PhD

Arch Surg. 2007;142(2):113-117.

Hypothesis  The improved survival after esophageal cancer surgery in Sweden during recent years may be attributable to the increased centralization of such surgery.

Design  Population-based study.

Setting  All Swedish residents undergoing esophageal cancer surgery from January 1, 1987, through December 31, 2000, were identified from the inpatient and cancer registers and were followed up until October 18, 2004, through nationwide registers. Hospital, tumor, and patient characteristics and preoperative oncological treatment were assessed through the registers and histopathological records.

Patients  Among 4904 patients with esophageal cancer, 1199 patients (24.4%) who underwent resection constituted the study cohort.

Main Outcome Measure  Survival rates and hazard ratios (HRs) relative to hospital volume. Low-volume hospitals (LVHs) conducted fewer than 10 esophagectomies annually, while high-volume hospitals (HVHs) conducted 10 or more. Hazard ratios were adjusted for several potential confounders.

Results  Thirty-day survival was 96% at HVHs and 91% at LVHs (P = .09). Survival rates 1, 3, and 5 years after surgery at HVHs were nonsignificantly higher (58%, 35%, and 27%, respectively) compared with those at LVHs (55%, 30%, and 24%, respectively). The adjusted HR was nonsignificantly 10% decreased at HVHs (HR, 0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.79-1.04). In an analysis restricted to 764 patients (64%) without preoperative oncological treatment (in which the tumor stage was also adjusted for), survival was similar at HVHs and at LVHs (HR, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.84-1.18).

Conclusions  This study revealed no effect of hospital volume on long-term survival after esophageal cancer surgery. Tumor biology apparently has a greater effect on the chances of long-term survival than hospital volume.

Author Affiliations: Unit of Esophageal and Gastric Research, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery (Drs Rouvelas, Lindblad, and Lagergren and Ms Viklund), and Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Drs Zeng and Ye), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; and Department of Mathematics, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China (Dr Zeng).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati     What's this?

RELATED LETTERS

Results of Esophagectomy in High- and Low-Volume Centers
M. Badruddoja
Arch Surg. 2007;142(11):1112-1113.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Results of Esophagectomy in High- and Low-Volume Centers—Reply
Ioannis Rouvelas and Jesper Lagergren
Arch Surg. 2007;142(11):1113-1114.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED ARTICLE

Impact of Hospital Volume on Long-term Survival After Esophageal Cancer Surgery—Invited Critique
Richard F. Heitmiller
Arch Surg. 2007;142(2):118.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Directing Surgical Quality Improvement Initiatives: Comparison of Perioperative Mortality and Long-Term Survival for Cancer Surgery
Bilimoria et al.
JCO 2008;26:4626-4633.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

No Influence of Surgical Volume on Patients' Health-Related Quality of Life After Esophageal Cancer Resection
Rutegard and Lagergren
Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2008;15:2380-2387.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Results of Esophagectomy in High- and Low-Volume Centers
Badruddoja
Arch Surg 2007;142:1112-1113.
FULL TEXT