You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 142 No. 3, March 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Surgery, Other
 •Medical Education
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Cost-Aware Care

Critical Core Competency

Rajiv Y. Chandawarkar, MD; Shiv Taylor, MD; Peter Abrams, MD; Andrew Duffy, MD; Anthony Voytovich, MD; Walter E. Longo, MD; Robert A. Kozol, MD

Arch Surg. 2007;142(3):222-226.

Hypothesis  Resident core competence can be improved by learning to accurately estimate the costs of postoperative complications.

Design  Prospective, institutional review board–approved study. In step 1, residents were provided 3 clinical vignettes detailing specific treatment measures for postsurgical complications and asked to assign total cost estimates for the treatment for each vignette; in step 2 they were given a pocket-sized cost card listing hospital costs, and in step 3, after 2 weeks, they were retested using the same clinical vignettes as in step 1.

Setting  University of Connecticut, Farmington, and the Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven.

Participants  Fifty-three general surgery residents.

Main Outcome Measures  Cost estimates for steps 1 and 3 were compared using the paired t test and analysis of variance to examine whether there is a difference between the baseline cost estimates and the actual cost; whether introduction of the cost card improves performance; and whether responses correlate to postgraduate year level or to the clinical vignette.

Results  There was a statistically significant difference between the baseline cost estimates (before introduction of the cost card) and the actual cost of the treatment (P = .03). Introduction of the cost card resulted in a statistically significant improvement between the cost estimates before and after the intervention (P = .002), with a drop in average percentage error by 35% (range, 32%-38%). Level of postgraduate training or type of test vignette (at analysis of variance) did not seem to be a significant factor.

Conclusions  There is a lack of awareness among surgical residents of the cost of treatment of postoperative complications. Introduction of a simple educational tool such as a cost card measurably improves their overall understanding of the cost of care and can be easily incorporated into the residency curriculum.


Author Affiliations: Division of Plastic Surgery (Dr Chandawarkar) and Departments of Medicine (Dr Voytovich) and Surgery (Drs Taylor and Kozol), University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington; and Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (Drs Abrams, Duffy, and Longo).







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2007 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.