
How Surgical Residents Spend Their Training TimeThe Effect of a Goal-Oriented Work Style on Efficiency and Work Satisfaction
Raphael S. Chung, MD, MBA;
Naveed Ahmed, MD
Arch Surg. 2007;142(3):249-252.
Hypothesis When work hours are limited, improving residents' work efficiency allows more time for key training activities, reduces frustration, and improves work satisfaction.
Design Prospective control study.
Setting General surgical service with a trauma program.
Participants Five full-time attending physicians, a resident team of 9 members, and 3 surgical assistants.
Intervention Reorganization of work habits based on a goal-oriented work style.
Main Outcome Measures Changes of time spent in key activities; punctuality for operations, clinics, and conferences; residents' work satisfaction, physical fatigue, and mental stress; and attending physician and patient evaluations of residents.
Results A goal-oriented work style reduced round time and nonpurposeful time and improved punctuality for key education activities. More operative time could be accommodated within the work-hours limits. Residents' work satisfaction improved while mental stress was reduced. Patient satisfaction scores also increased.
Conclusions Residents' work is generally inefficient. Reduced work hours should be accompanied by work-habit reform to make the best use of residents' training time.
Author Affiliations: Department of Surgery, Huron Hospital, Cleveland Clinic Health System, Cleveland, Ohio.
CiteULike Connotea Delicious Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLE
How Surgical Residents Spend Their Training TimeInvited Critique
Edward H. Livingston
Arch Surg. 2007;142(3):252.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
Otolaryngology Resident Workflow: A Time-Motion and Efficiency Study
Victores et al.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2011;144:708-713.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Three Perspectives of Rounds: Choreographing Information Flow in an Intensive Care Unit
Xiao et al.
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 2008;52:825-829.
ABSTRACT
|