You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 142 No. 4, April 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Paper
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Surgical Oncology
 •Breast Cancer
 •Ultrasonography
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Sonographic Hematoma-Guided vs Wire-Localized Lumpectomy for Breast Cancer

A Comparison of Margins and Volume of Resection

Rakhshanda Layeequr Rahman, MD; Elaine Iuanow, MD; Sybil Crawford, MS; Robert Quinlan, MD

Arch Surg. 2007;142:343-346.

Hypothesis  Sonographic hematoma-guided (SHG) lumpectomy achieves better margin clearance with a smaller volume of resection compared with wire-localized (WL) lumpectomy.

Design  Retrospective study.

Setting  University Comprehensive Breast Center.

Patients  Consecutive patients treated over 6 months at the breast center with stereotactic biopsy–proven cancers that were not visualized on ultrasonography. The SHG and WL techniques were compared.

Main Outcome Measures  The matching variables were age, mammographic abnormality, tumor size and type, and lymph node status. The outcome variables were the closest margin of resection, volume of resection, resection index (resection volume divided by tumor volume), and rate of margin revision.

Results  Twenty-nine patients had SHG lumpectomy and 34 had WL lumpectomy. The SHG and WL groups were similar in age, mammographic abnormality, tumor size and type, and lymph node status. The median (interquartile range) closest margin was 5.0 (5-8) mm in the SHG group vs 3.5 (1-7) mm in the WL group (P = .01). The median (interquartile range) resection volume was 85.0 (60-128) cm3 in the SHG group vs 143.4 (54-229) cm3 in the WL group (P = .048). The median (interquartile range) resection index was 77.1 (51-220) in the SHG group vs 315.9 (89-3025) in the WL group (P = .003). The margin was revised in 1 (3.4%) of the patients who underwent SHG lumpectomy vs 5 (14.7%) of the patients who underwent WL lumpectomy (P = .20).

Conclusions  Sonographic hematoma-guided lumpectomy is superior to WL lumpectomy in obtaining adequate margins while minimizing the volume of resection.


Author Affiliations: Departments of Surgery (Drs Layeequr Rahman and Quinlan), Radiology (Dr Iuanow), and Behavioral Sciences (Ms Crawford), UMass Memorial Health Care, Worcester, Mass.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Superiority of Sonographic Hematoma Guided Resection of Mammogram Only Visible Breast Cancer: Wire Localization Should be an Exception Not the Rule
Rahman et al.
Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2007;14:2228-2232.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2007 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.