You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 142 No. 4, April 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Paper
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (1)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Practice, Other
 •Surgery, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Surgeon Profiling

A Key to Optimum Operating Room Use

Suzanne M. Sokal, MSPH; Yuchiao Chang, PhD; David L. Craft, PhD; Warren S. Sandberg, MD, PhD; Peter F. Dunn, MD; David L. Berger, MD

Arch Surg. 2007;142:365-370.

Hypothesis  A high-efficiency Pod, composed of 3 parallel-processing operating rooms (ORs) and a dedicated 3-bed miniature postanesthesia care unit, can be filled with surgeons capable of converting time saved from parallel processing into incremental volume.

Design  Statistical and mathematical modeling.

Setting  Academic medical center with 52 serial-processing ORs, 1 parallel-processing OR, and a congested postanesthesia care unit.

Participants  Elective surgical cases (N = 58 356) performed by a single surgical service without a preoperative intensive care unit bed request from April 1, 2004, through March 31, 2006.

Interventions  Results from our parallel-processing OR (n = 1729) were extrapolated to all other cases (n = 56 627) to estimate the duration of key process time intervals as if they were performed using parallel processing. Cases that could yield incremental throughput using parallel processing were labeled "good." Total good case hours per week were then aggregated for each surgeon.

Main Outcomes Measures  Surgeons with 4.5 hours per week or more of good case time had a "profile" suitable for a 9-hour block in The Pod every 2 weeks.

Results  Of the 352 profiled surgeons, 30 had 4.5 hours per week or more of good case time, more than filling the 15 blocks per week.

Conclusions  The high-efficiency OR Pod can fill each of its 3 ORs with case/surgeon combinations that should yield additional throughput. Surgeon profiles based on stringent efficiency targets maximize the throughput potential of The Pod's active ORs and more than compensate for the OR turned miniature postanesthesia care unit.


Author Affiliations: Decision Support and Quality Management Unit (Ms Sokal) and Departments of Medicine (Dr Chang), Surgery (Drs Craft and Berger), and Anesthesia and Critical Care (Drs Sandberg and Dunn), Massachusetts General Hospital; and Departments of Anesthesia (Drs Sandberg and Dunn) and Surgery (Dr Berger), Harvard Medical School, Boston.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Operating-Room Throughput: Strategies for Improvement
Saleh et al.
JBJS 2009;91:2028-2039.
FULL TEXT  

Patient Waiting Time Matters When Filling a Pod of Operating Rooms
Dexter and Wachtel
Arch Surg 2007;142:1114-1114.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2007 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.