You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 142 No. 6, June 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Paper
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •CME Course for This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Vascular Surgery
 •Venous Thromboembolism
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Aggressive Percutaneous Mechanical Thrombectomy of Deep Venous Thrombosis

Early Clinical Results

Frank R. Arko, MD; Charles M. Davis III, BS; Erin H. Murphy, MD; Stephen T. Smith, MD; Carlos H. Timaran, MD; J. Gregory Modrall, MD; R. James Valentine, MD; G. Patrick Clagett, MD

Arch Surg. 2007;142:513-519.

Objective  To evaluate percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy for deep venous thrombosis (DVT).

Design  A retrospective analysis.

Setting  Tertiary academic medical center.

Patients  Thirty patients with DVT who underwent percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy.

Interventions  Percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy of upper or lower extremity DVT.

Main Outcome Measures  Thrombus removal, patency, and valvular function. Venography and intravascular ultrasonography assessed periprocedural lysis. Duplex ultrasonography assessed patency and valvular function before and after the procedure.

Results  Fourteen patients had iliofemoral, 6 had iliofemoropopliteal, 5 had femoropopliteal, and 5 had subclavian vein thromboses. Mean age was 50.9 years (range, 15-78 years); 10 patients (33%) had a documented hypercoagulable state. There was 100% technical success in crossing the DVT, with treatment performed in a single setting in 24 patients (80%). Mean ± SD procedural time was 145 ± 35 minutes; range, 55-210 minutes. Mean thrombolytic dose was 6.2 mg of tenecteplase with the Trellis-8 and 10 mg with the AngioJet. Adjunctive procedures were required in 28 patients (percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stent placement in 17 and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty alone in 11). Recoverable inferior vena cava filters were placed in 21 patients and retrieved within 4 weeks. There were no clinically significant periprocedural pulmonary emboli; however, 5 patients (17%) had evidence of pulmonary embolism on computed tomographic angiography (all in patients without inferior vena cava filters). Venous patency was maintained in 27 patients (90%) and lower extremity valvular function was maintained in 22 (88%) of 25 treated lower limbs, with a mean follow-up of 6.2 months (range, 3-24 months).

Conclusions  Percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy is effective in the treatment of acute DVT in the upper and lower extremity to restore venous patency. In the lower extremity, valvular function is maintained acutely. Continued surveillance and follow-up will be necessary to determine whether valvular function is maintained long-term.


Author Affiliations: Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Current Treatment of Acute Lower Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis
Janjigian and Muhs
INT J LOW EXTREM WOUNDS 2008;7:15-20.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2007 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.