You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 142 No. 7, July 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on ISI (1)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Postoperative Outcomes in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinomas Resected With Exposure of the Tumor Surface

Clinical Role of the No-Margin Resection

Yoichi Matsui, MD; Naoyoshi Terakawa, MD; Sohei Satoi, MD; Masaki Kaibori, MD; Hiroaki Kitade, MD; Soichiro Takai, MD; A-Hon Kwon, MD; Yasuo Kamiyama, MD

Arch Surg. 2007;142(7):596-602.

Hypothesis  We hypothesized that no-margin resections for hepatocellular carcinoma do not negatively affect patient outcomes.

Design  Inception cohort study.

Setting  Department of surgery at a university hospital.

Patients  From January 1992 to December 2005 at our institute, 465 consecutive patients with a preoperative diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma with curative potential were evaluated.

Intervention  Liver resection performed with or without surgical margins.

Main Outcome Measures  Overall survival and no-recurrence survival.

Results  Of the 465 patients, 62 underwent resections with exposure of the tumor surface at the cut stump (the cut surface of the remnant liver) with no surgical margins (exposure group), because the tumor adhered to the major hepatic vascular structures. The remaining 365 patients underwent resections without exposure of the tumor surface (nonexposure group). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups regarding the recurrence and overall survival rates. There were also no significant differences between the 2 groups with respect to the recurrence rate at the cut stump or the number and the location of intrahepatic recurrences, despite the less favorable clinical histories in the exposure group.

Conclusions  Limited resection with no margin seems to be the best procedure for patients with tumors close to the major hepatic vessels and with hepatic functions that do not permit wide-margin resections.


Author Affiliations: Department of Surgery, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan.


RELATED ARTICLE

Postoperative Outcomes in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinomas Resected With Exposure of the Tumor Surface—Invited Critique
Jeffrey B. Matthews
Arch Surg. 2007;142(7):603.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2007 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.