You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 142 No. 7, July 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on ISI (1)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Gastrointestinal Diseases
 •Colorectal Surgery
 •Surgical Oncology
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Colon Cancer
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Oncological Outcome of Local vs Radical Resection of Low-Risk pT1 Rectal Cancer

Henry Ptok, MD; Frank Marusch, PhD; Frank Meyer, PhD; Daniel Schubert, MD; Ferdinand Koeckerling, PhD; Ingo Gastinger, PhD; Hans Lippert, PhD; for the Colon/Rectal Cancer (Primary Tumor) Study Group

Arch Surg. 2007;142(7):649-654.

Hypothesis  Despite the noninclusion of locally draining lymph nodes, limited resection of low-risk pT1 rectal cancer can achieve an adequate oncological outcome with lower morbidity and mortality compared with radical resection.

Design  Based on the data of a prospective multicenter observational study performed from January 1, 2000, through December 31, 2001, patients with low-risk pT1 rectal cancer underwent analysis with regard to the early postoperative outcome and the oncological long-term results achieved after limited vs radical resection with curative intent.

Setting  Two hundred eighty-two hospitals of all categories.

Patients  Four hundred seventy-nine patients with low-risk pT1 rectal cancer treated for cure.

Interventions  Eighty-five patients (17.7%) underwent limited excision using a conventional transanal approach and 35 (7.3%) using transanal endoscopic microsurgery. The remaining 359 (74.9%) underwent radical resection.

Main Outcome Measures  Postoperative morbidity and mortality, local recurrence rate, and tumor-free and overall survival.

Results  In comparison with radical resection, limited resection was associated with fewer general (25.1% vs 7.5%; P<.001) and specific (22.8% vs 9.2%; P<.001) postoperative complications. After a mean follow-up of 44 months, patients who underwent limited resection had a significantly higher 5-year local tumor recurrence rate than did those who underwent radical resection (6.0% vs 2.0%; P = .049), but tumor-free survival did not differ.

Conclusion  Limited resection of pT1 low-risk rectal cancer can result in an oncologically acceptable outcome but must nevertheless be considered an oncological compromise compared with radical resection.


Author Affiliations: Institute for Quality Control in Operative Medicine (Drs Ptok, Marusch, Gastinger, and Lippert) and Department of General, Visceral, and Vascular Surgery (Drs Ptok, Meyer, Schubert, and Lippert), Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany; Department of Surgery, Carl-Thiem Hospital Cottbus, Cottbus, Germany (Drs Ptok, Marusch, and Gastinger); and Department of Surgery, Hanover-Hospital, Hanover, Germany (Dr Koeckerling).


RELATED ARTICLE

Oncological Outcome of Local vs Radical Resection of Low-Risk pT1 Rectal Cancer—Invited Critique
James Church
Arch Surg. 2007;142(7):656.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2007 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.