You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 142 No. 8, August 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Paper
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (1)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Surgery, Other
 •Medical Education
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Impact of the 80-Hour Workweek on Patient Care at a Level I Trauma Center

Ali Salim, MD; Pedro G. R. Teixeira, MD; Linda Chan, PhD; Didem Oncel, MD; Kenji Inaba, MD; Carlos Brown, MD; Peter Rhee, MD; Thomas V. Berne, MD

Arch Surg. 2007;142:708-714.

Hypothesis  The 80-hour workweek limitation for surgical residents is associated with an increase in mortality and complication rates among adult trauma surgical patients.

Design  Retrospective cohort study.

Setting  Academic level I trauma center.

Patients  Trauma patients admitted before and after the 80-hour workweek limitation.

Methods  We compared death and complication rates for adult trauma patients admitted during a 24-month period before (2001-2003) and a 24-month period after (2004-2006) implementation of the 80-hour workweek at our institution. Relative risk and its 95% confidence intervals were examined.

Main Outcome Measures  Patient care outcomes included preventable and nonpreventable complications and deaths.

Results  The patient populations from the 2 time periods were clinically similar. No significant differences were found in the total and the preventable death rates. The time period after the 80-hour workweek mandate had a significantly higher total complication rate (5.64% vs 7.28%; relative risk, 1.29; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-1.45; P < .001), preventable complication rate (0.89% vs 1.28%; relative risk, 1.43; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-1.91; P = .02), and nonpreventable complication rate (4.75% vs 5.81%; relative risk, 1.22; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-1.39; P = .002).

Conclusion  Although there was no difference in deaths between the 2 time periods, there was a significant increase in total, preventable, and nonpreventable complications. This increase in complication rate may be due, in part, to the new 80-hour workweek policy.


Author Affiliations: Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma and Critical Care, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine and the Los Angeles County + University of Southern California Medical Center, Los Angeles.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Update in Critical Care 2007
Fowler et al.
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2008;177:808-819.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2007 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.