This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related article  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Bacterial Infections  • Pulmonary Diseases  • Pneumonia  • Quality of Care  • Evidence-Based Medicine  • Surgery  • Surgical Interventions  • Thoracic Surgery  • Review  • Drug Therapy  • Drug Therapy, Other  • Infectious Diseases  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

A Meta-Analysis

Daniel M. Pöpping, MD; Nadia Elia, MD; Emmanuel Marret, MD; Camille Remy, MD; Martin R. Tramèr, MD, DPhil

Arch Surg. 2008;143(10):990-999.

Objective  To review the impact of epidural vs systemic analgesia on postoperative pulmonary complications.

Data Sources  Search of databases (1966 to March 2006) and bibliographies.

Study Selection  Inclusion criteria were randomized comparison of epidural vs systemic analgesia lasting 24 hours or longer postoperatively and reporting of pulmonary complications, lung function, or gas exchange. Fifty-eight trials (5904 patients) were included.

Data Extraction  Articles were reviewed and data extracted. Data were combined using fixed-effect and random-effects models.

Data Synthesis  The odds of pneumonia were decreased with epidural analgesia (odds ratio [OR], 0.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.43-0.68), independent of site of surgery or catheter insertion, duration of analgesia, or regimen. The effect was weaker in trials that used patient-controlled analgesia in controls (OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.49-0.83) compared with trials that did not (OR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.18-0.49) and in larger studies (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.47-0.81) compared with smaller studies (OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.23-0.58). From 1971-2006, the incidence of pneumonia with epidural analgesia remained about 8% but decreased from 34% to 12% with systemic analgesia (P < .001); consequently, the relative benefit of epidural analgesia decreased also. Epidural analgesia reduced the need for prolonged ventilation or reintubation, improved lung function and blood oxygenation, and increased the risk of hypotension, urinary retention, and pruritus. Technical failures occurred in 7%.

Conclusion  Epidural analgesia protects against pneumonia following abdominal or thoracic surgery, although this beneficial effect has lessened over the last 35 years because of a decrease in the baseline risk.

Author Affiliations: Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany (Dr Pöpping); Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Tenon University Hospital, Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France (Drs Marret and Remy); and Division of Anesthesiology, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland (Dr Elia and Prof Tramèr).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Protective Effects of Epidural Analgesia on Pulmonary Complications After Abdominal and Thoracic Surgery—Invited Critique
William T. Merritt and Michael Marohn
Arch Surg. 2008;143(10):1000.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Perioperative Epidural Analgesia and Prevention of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia
Tornero-Campello
Chest 2009;136:322-322.
FULL TEXT