You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 143 No. 12, December 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Quality of Care
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Surgery
 •Surgical Interventions
 •Neurosurgery
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Emergency Medicine
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Effect of Trauma Center Designation on Outcome in Patients With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury

Joseph J. DuBose, MD; Timothy Browder, MD; Kenji Inaba, MD; Pedro G. R. Teixeira, MD; Linda S. Chan, PhD; Demetrios Demetriades, MD, PhD

Arch Surg. 2008;143(12):1213-1217.

Objective  To determine the association of the American College of Surgeons (ACS) designation with outcomes in patients, specifically those with severe traumatic brain injuries.

Design  A retrospective review. Logistic regression was performed for mortality, complications, and progression of initial neurologic insult.

Setting  Data from the National Trauma Data Bank.

Patients  A total of 16 037 patients with isolated severe head injury (head acute injury score, ≥3 and other body region abbreviated injury score, <3) classified into 2 groups (level 1 and level 2) according to ACS designation.

Results  Patients admitted to a level 2 center had higher mortality rates (13.9% vs 9.6%; P < .001), higher rates of complication (15.5% vs 10.6%; P < .001), and higher rates of progression of initial neurologic insult (2.0% vs 1.1%; P < .001). After adjustment for the factors that were different between the 2 groups, admission to a level 2 facility remained an independent predictor of mortality (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.41-1.75; P < .001), complications (adjusted OR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.40-1.71; P < .001), and progression of neurologic insult (adjusted OR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.37-2.31; P < .001). Other independent risk factors for mortality were penetrating mechanism, age of 55 years or older, Injury Severity Score of 20 or higher, Glasgow Coma Scale score of 8 or lower, and hypotension (systolic blood pressure, <90 mm Hg).

Conclusion  Patients with severe traumatic brain injury treated in ACS-designated level 1 trauma centers have better survival rates and outcomes than those treated in ACS-designated level 2 centers.


Author Affiliations: Los Angeles County Hospital, University of Southern California School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Effect of Trauma Center Designation on Outcome in Patients With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury—Invited Critique
David B. Hoyt
Arch Surg. 2008;143(12):1217.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.