You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 143 No. 4, April 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  Original Article
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (21)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letters
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Revascularization
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Quality of Care
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Surgery
 •Surgical Interventions
 •Cardiovascular/ Cardiothoracic Surgery
 •Cardiovascular Intervention
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Volume-Outcome Relationship for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in an Era of Decreasing Volume

Rocco Ricciardi, MD, MPH; Beth A. Virnig, PhD, MPH; James W. Ogilvie Jr, MD; Peter S. Dahlberg, MD; Harry P. Selker, MD, MSPH; Nancy N. Baxter, MD, PhD

Arch Surg. 2008;143(4):338-344.

Hypothesis  We hypothesized that the recent reduction in procedure volume for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has led to an increase in the in-hospital mortality rate.

Design  Hospital discharge data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from January 1, 1988, through December 31, 2003.

Setting  A 20% random sample of patients admitted to US hospitals.

Patients  All patients who underwent CABG or percutaneous transluminal coronary interventions. Facilities performing CABG were assigned to standard volume cutoffs.

Main Outcome Measures  Rates of cardiac procedures and the proportion of hospitals meeting standard volume cutoffs, as well as the CABG mortality rate.

Results  During our 16-year study period, the rate of CABG increased from 7.2 cases per 1000 discharges in 1988 to 12.2 cases in 1997 but then decreased to 9.1 cases in 2003, while the rate of percutaneous interventions tripled. For CABG, the proportion of high-volume hospitals declined from 32.5% in 1997 to 15.5% in 2003. Despite shifts between high- and low-volume hospitals, the CABG mortality rate steadily declined from 5.4% in 1988 to 3.3% in 2003. Hospitals performing the lowest volume of CABG experienced the largest decrease in the in-hospital mortality rate.

Conclusions  Since 1997, CABG volume has declined in the setting of a decrease in in-hospital mortality. A lower mortality rate in the setting of reduced CABG volume is a counterintuitive finding, suggesting that procedure volume is an insufficient predictor of outcome on which to base regionalization strategies.


Author Affiliations: Department of Surgery, Medical School (Drs Ricciardi, Virnig, Ogilvie, and Dahlberg), and Division of Health Services Research, School of Public Health (Dr Virnig), University of Minnesota, Minneapolis; Division of Clinical Care Research, Department of Medicine, New England Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts (Dr Selker); and Department of Surgery, St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Dr Baxter). Dr Ricciardi is now with the Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Lahey Clinic, Tufts University, Burlington, Massachusetts.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED LETTERS

Volume and Outcome: Equipoise at Last
Aisling M. Hogan and Desmond C. Winter
Arch Surg. 2008;143(12):1235.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Volume and Outcome: Equipoise at Last—Reply
Rocco Ricciardi and Nancy N. Baxter
Arch Surg. 2008;143(12):1235.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED ARTICLE

Volume-Outcome Relationship for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in an Era of Decreasing Volume—Invited Critique
David D. Yuh
Arch Surg. 2008;143(4):344.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Quality, not volume, determines outcome of coronary artery bypass surgery in a university-based community hospital network
Kurlansky et al.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2012;143:287-293.e1.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Mortality Rate After Nonelective Hospital Admission
Ricciardi et al.
Arch Surg 2011;146:545-551.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Medicare Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty, 1991-2008
Cram et al.
JAMA 2011;305:1560-1567.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cyclical Increase in Diverticulitis During the Summer Months
Ricciardi et al.
Arch Surg 2011;146:319-323.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Testing the Association Between Patient Safety Indicators and Hospital Structural Characteristics in VA and Nonfederal Hospitals
Rivard et al.
Med Care Res Rev 2010;67:321-341.
ABSTRACT  

Association of hospital coronary artery bypass volume with processes of care, mortality, morbidity, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons composite quality score
Shahian et al.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2010;139:273-282.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Institutional Variability of Intraoperative Red Blood Cell Utilization in Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
Maddux et al.
American Journal of Medical Quality 2009;24:403-411.
ABSTRACT  

Shop for Quality or Volume? Volume, Quality, and Outcomes of Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Auerbach et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2009;150:696-704.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Volume and Outcome: Equipoise at Last
Hogan and Winter
Arch Surg 2008;143:1235-1235.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.