You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 143 No. 4, April 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Endoscopy/ Minimally Invasive Surgery
 •Randomized Controlled Trial
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Hepatobiliary Surgery
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Randomized Clinical Trial of Small-Incision and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Patients With Symptomatic Cholecystolithiasis

Primary and Clinical Outcomes

Frederik Keus, MD; Johanna E. M. Werner, MD, PhD; Hein G. Gooszen, MD, PhD; Henk J. M. Oostvogel, MD, PhD; Cornelis J. H. M. van Laarhoven, MD, PhD

Arch Surg. 2008;143(4):371-377.

Objective  To evaluate the primary and clinical outcomes in laparoscopic and small-incision cholecystectomy.

Design  Blinded randomized single-center trial emphasizing methodologic quality and generalizability.

Setting  General teaching hospital in the Netherlands.

Patients  A total of 257 patients undergoing cholecystectomy for symptomatic cholecystolithiasis.

Interventions  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and small-incision cholecystectomy, performed mainly by surgical residents.

Main Outcome Measures  Complications and symptom relief were primary outcome measures; conversion rate, operative time, and hospital stay were secondary outcome measures. Feasibility of performing both procedures by residents was evaluated as well.

Results  In the 257 patients, surgical residents performed 105 laparoscopic and 118 small-incision cholecystectomies. There were no significant differences in complications, conversion rates, and hospital stay. Operative time was significantly shorter with the small-incision technique.

Conclusions  No differences in primary clinical outcome measures were found between laparoscopic and small-incision cholecystectomy in this randomized trial with emphasis on methodologic quality and generalizability. The gold standard status of laparoscopic cholecystectomy is questionable.

Trial Registration  isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN67485658


Author Affiliations: Department of Surgery, St Elisabeth Hospital, Tilburg, the Netherlands (Drs Keus, Werner, Oostvogel, and van Laarhoven); and Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre, Utrecht, the Netherlands (Dr Gooszen). Dr Keus is now with the Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht; Dr Werner is now with the Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre St Radboud, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Randomized Clinical Trial of Small-Incision and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Patients With Symptomatic Cholecystolithiasis: Primary and Clinical Outcomes—Invited Critique
Charles D. Mabry
Arch Surg. 2008;143(4):377-378.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.