You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 143 No. 4, April 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Drug Therapy, Other
 •Radiation Therapy
 •Gastrointestinal Diseases
 •Colorectal Surgery
 •Colon Cancer
 •Patient-Physician Communication
 •Drug Therapy
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Patient and Physician Preferences for Surgical and Adjuvant Treatment Options for Rectal Cancer

James D. Harrison, BSc(Hons), MPH; Michael J. Solomon, MBBCh(Hons), MSc, FRACS; Jane M. Young, MBBS, MPH, PhD, FAFPHM; Alan Meagher, MBBS, FRACS; Phyllis Butow, BA(Hons), DipEd, MClinPsych, MPH, PhD; Glenn Salkeld, BBus, GDipHealthEcon, MPH, PhD; George Hruby, MBBCh, FRANZCR; Stephen Clarke, MBBS, PhD, FRACP, FAChPM

Arch Surg. 2008;143(4):389-394.

Hypothesis  Patients and their clinicians hold varying preferences for surgical and adjuvant treatment therapies for rectal cancer.

Design  Preferences were determined using the Prospective Measure of Preference.

Setting  Royal Prince Alfred and St Vincent's hospitals in Sydney, Australia.

Participants  Patients with colorectal cancer were interviewed during their postoperative hospital stay, and physicians were asked to complete a mailed survey.

Main Outcome Measures  The Prospective Measure of Preference method produces 2 outcome measures of preference: willingness to trade and prospective measure of preference time trade-off.

Results  Patients' strongest preference was to avoid a stoma: more than 60% would give up a mean of 34% of their life expectancy to avoid this surgical option. This was followed by treatment options involving chemoradiotherapy, where more than 50% would give up a mean of almost 25% of their life to avoid treatment. Surgeons held stronger preferences against all adjuvant options compared with oncologists (P ≤ .01).

Conclusions  Patients had strong preferences against all treatment options, and these preferences frequently differed from those of physicians. These results highlight the importance of determining patients' own preferences in the clinical encounter. Furthermore, the diversity of preferences of clinical subspecialists emphasizes the need for multidisciplinary treatment planning to ensure a balanced approach to treatment decision making for patients with rectal cancer.


Author Affiliations: Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Sydney South West Area Health Service and University of Sydney (Mr Harrison and Drs Solomon, Young, Butow, and Salkeld); Department of Colorectal Surgery, St Vincent's Hospital (Dr Meagher); Departments of Radiation Oncology (Dr Hruby) and Medical Oncology (Dr Clarke), Sydney Cancer Centre; and Department of Colorectal Research, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (Dr Solomon), Sydney, Australia.







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.