You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 143 No. 6, June 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Cardiovascular/ Cardiothoracic Surgery
 •Vascular Surgery
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Improved Survival After Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Rupture by Offering Both Open and Endovascular Repair

Andreas Wibmer, MD; Maria Schoder, MD; Klaus S. Wolff, MD; Alexander M. Prusa, MD; Maryana Sahal, MD; Johannes Lammer, MD; Ihor Huk, MD; Peter Polterauer, MD; Georg Kretschmer, MD; Harald Teufelsbauer, MD

Arch Surg. 2008;143(6):544-549.

Background  In the treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA), the results of open graft replacement (OGR) have remained constant but discouraging for the last 4 decades. Provided suitable anatomy, elective endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) is less invasive and leads to improved perioperative mortality. Thus, it is reasonable to assume that endovascular treatment should improve the results of rAAA therapy.

Objective  To determine whether the use of both endovascular and open repair of rAAA leads to improved results.

Design  A single-center, retrospective analysis of 89 patients suffering from rAAA treated either by EVAR or OGR.

Patients  From October 1999 until July 2006, a consecutive series of patients with rAAA were analyzed. Time was divided into 2 periods of 41 months. During the first period, 42 patients were treated by OGR exclusively. Period 2 started with the availability of an EVAR protocol to treat rAAA; 31 patients received open repair while 16 patients underwent EVAR.

Main Outcome Measures  Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were calculated and compared.

Results  Survival estimates showed a statistically significant reduction in overall postoperative mortality following the introduction of EVAR (P < .03). The 90-day overall mortality rate was reduced from 54.8% to 27.7% during the second period (P < .01). Survival of patients older than 75.5 years was especially improved (75% vs 28.6%; P < .01). There was a parallel pattern of significant reduction of the mortality rate after OGR to 29% (P < .03).

Conclusion  Offering both EVAR and OGR to patients with rAAA leads to significant improvements in postoperative survival.


Author Affiliations: Department of Vascular Surgery (Drs Wibmer, Prusa, Sahal, Huk, Polterauer, Kretschmer, and Teufelsbauer), and Department of Angiography and Interventional Radiology (Drs Schoder and Lammer), Medical University of Vienna; and the Department of Surgery (Dr Wolff), Austrian Armed Forces Hospital, Vienna, Austria.


RELATED ARTICLE

Improved Survival After Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Rupture by Offering Both Open and Endovascular Repair—Invited Critique
William C. Pevec
Arch Surg. 2008;143(6):550.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.