• Online Features  This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (10)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related article  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Quality of Care  • Quality of Care, Other  • Surgery  • Surgical Interventions  • Surgical Interventions, Other  • Surgical Physiology  • Blood/ Coagulation  • Prognosis/ Outcomes  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Validation in 4119 Patients

Scott E. Regenbogen, MD, MPH; Jesse M. Ehrenfeld, MD; Stuart R. Lipsitz, ScD; Caprice C. Greenberg, MD, MPH; Matthew M. Hutter, MD, MPH; Atul A. Gawande, MD, MPH

Arch Surg. 2009;144(1):30-36.

Objectives  To confirm the utility of a 10-point Surgical Apgar Score to rate surgical outcomes in a large cohort of patients.

Design  Using electronic intraoperative records, we calculated Surgical Apgar Scores during a period of 2 years (July 1, 2003, through June 30, 2005).

Setting  Major academic medical center.

Patients  Systematic sample of 4119 general and vascular surgery patients enrolled in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program surgical outcomes database at a major academic medical center.

Main Outcome Measures  Incidence of major postoperative complications and/or death within 30 days of surgery.

Results  Of 1441 patients with scores of 9 to 10, 72 (5.0%) developed major complications within 30 days, including 2 deaths (0.1%). By comparison, among 128 patients with scores of 4 or less, 72 developed major complications (56.3%; relative risk, 11.3; 95% confidence interval, 8.6-14.8; P < .001), of whom 25 died (19.5%; relative risk, 140.7; 95% confidence interval, 33.7-587.4; P < .001). The 3-variable score achieves C statistics of 0.73 for major complications and 0.81 for deaths.

Conclusions  The Surgical Apgar Score provides a simple, immediate, objective means of measuring and communicating patient outcomes in surgery, using data routinely available in any setting. The score can be effective in identifying patients at higher- and lower-than-average likelihood of major complications and/or death after surgery and may be useful for evaluating interventions to prevent poor outcomes.

Author Affiliations: Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health (Drs Regenbogen, Greenberg, and Gawande), Departments of Surgery (Drs Regenbogen and Hutter) and Anesthesia and Critical Care (Dr Ehrenfeld), Massachusetts General Hospital, and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital (Drs Lipsitz, Greenberg, and Gawande), Boston, Massachusetts.

CiteULike    Connotea    Delicious    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Utility of the Surgical Apgar Score—Invited Critique
Darrell A. Campbell, Jr
Arch Surg. 2009;144(1):37.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Apples and Oranges: Comparison of ACS-NSQIP Observed Outcomes With Premier's Quality Manager-Predicted Outcomes
Lee et al.
American Journal of Medical Quality 2011;26:474-479.
ABSTRACT  

Clinical risk scores to guide perioperative management
Barnett and Moonesinghe
Postgrad. Med. J. 2011;87:535-541.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT