You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 144 No. 6, June 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Rehabilitation Medicine
 •Statistics and Research Methods
 •Surgery
 •Surgical Interventions
 •Orthopedic Surgery
 •Endocrine Diseases
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Survival Analysis in Amputees Based on Physical Independence Grade Achievement

Margaret G. Stineman, MD; Jibby E. Kurichi, MPH; Pui L. Kwong, MPH; Greg Maislin, MS, MA; Dean M. Reker, PhD; W. Bruce Vogel, PhD; Janet A. Prvu-Bettger, ScD; Douglas E. Bidelspach, MPT; Barbara E. Bates, MD

Arch Surg. 2009;144(6):543-551.

Backgound  Survival implications of achieving different grades of physical independence after lower extremity amputation are unknown.

Objectives  To identify thresholds of physical independence achievement associated with improved 6-month survival and to identify and compare other risk factors after removing the influence of the grade achieved.

Design  Data were combined from 8 administrative databases. Grade was measured on the basis of 13 individual self-care and mobility activities measured at inpatient rehabilitation discharge.

Setting  Ninety-nine US Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Centers.

Patients  Retrospective longitudinal cohort study of 2616 veterans who underwent lower extremity amputation and subsequent inpatient rehabilitation between October 1, 2002, and September 30, 2004.

Main Outcome Measure  Cumulative 6-month survival after rehabilitation discharge.

Results  The 6-month survival rate (95% confidence interval [CI]) for those at grade 1 (total assistance) was 73.5% (70.5%-76.2%). The achievement of grade 2 (maximal assistance) led to the largest incremental improvement in prognosis with survival increasing to 91.1% (95% CI, 85.6%-94.5%). In amputees who remained at grade 1, the 30-day hazards ratio for survival compared with grade 6 (independent) was 43.9 (95% CI, 10.8-278.2), sharply decreasing with time. Whereas metastatic cancer and hemodialysis remained significantly associated with reduced survival (both P ≤ .001), anatomical amputation level was not significant when rehabilitation discharge grade and other diagnostic conditions were considered.

Conclusions  Even a small improvement to grade 2 in the most severely impaired amputees resulted in better 6-month survival. Health care systems must plan appropriate interdisciplinary treatment strategies for both medical and functional issues after amputation.


Author Affiliations: Departments of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Dr Stineman) and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (Drs Stineman and Prvu-Bettger, Mss Kurichi and Kwong, and Mr Maislin); Kansas City Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC), Kansas City, Missouri (Dr Reker); VAMC and Department of Epidemiology and Health Policy Research, Health Science Center, University of Florida, Gainesville (Dr Vogel); VAMC, Lebanon, Pennsylvania (Mr Bidelspach); Samuel S. Stratton VAMC and Albany Medical College, Albany, New York (Dr Bates).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Survival Analysis in Amputees Based on Physical Independence Grade Achievement—Invited Critique
Michael T. Watkins
Arch Surg. 2009;144(6):552.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.