 |
|
Hepatic Portal Venous GasThe ABCs of Management
Aaron L. Nelson, MD, PhD;
Timothy M. Millington, MD;
Dushyant Sahani, MD;
Raymond T. Chung, MD;
Christian Bauer, MD;
Martin Hertl, MD;
Andrew L. Warshaw, MD;
Claudius Conrad, MD, PhD, PhD
Arch Surg. 2009;144(6):575-581.
Objective To review the use of computed tomography (CT) and radiography in managing hepatic portal venous gas (HPVG) at a university-affiliated tertiary care center and in the literature. Hepatic portal venous gas is frequently associated with acute mesenteric ischemia, accounting for most of the HPVG-associated mortality. While early studies were necessarily dependent on plain abdominal radiography, modern high-resolution CT has revealed a host of benign conditions in which HPVG has been reported that do not require emergent surgery.
Data Sources Patient records from our institution over the last 10 years and relevant studies from BioMed Central, CENTRAL, PubMed, and PubMed Central. In addition, references cited in selected works were also used as source data.
Study Selection Patient records were selected if the CT or radiograph findings matched the term hepatic portal venous gas. Studies were selected based on the search terms hepatic portal venous gas or portal venous gas.
Data Extraction Quantitative and qualitative data were quoted directly from cited work.
Data Synthesis Early studies of HPVG were based on plain abdominal radiography and a literature survey in 1978 found an associated mortality rate of 75%, primarily due to ischemic bowel disease. Modern abdominal CT has resulted in the detection of HPVG in more benign conditions, and a second literature survey in 2001 found a total mortality of only 39%. While the pathophysiology of HPVG is, as yet, unclear, changing abdominal imaging technology has altered the significance of this radiologic finding. Hepatic portal venous gas therefore predicts high risk of mortality (>50%) if detected by plain radiography or by CT in a patient with additional evidence of necrotic bowel. If detected by CT in patients after surgical or endoscopic manipulation, the clinician is advised that there is no evidence of increased risk. If HPVG is detected by CT in patients with active peptic ulcer disease, intestinal obstruction and/or dilatation, or mucosal diseases such as Crohn disease or ulcerative colitis, caution is warranted, as risk of death may approach 20% to 30%.
Conclusion The finding of HPVG alone cannot be an indication for emergency exploration, and we have developed an evidence-based algorithm to guide the clinician in management of patients with HPVG.
Author Affiliations: Tufts University School of Medicine (Dr Nelson) and Departments of Surgery (Drs Millington, Hertl, Warshaw, and Conrad), Radiology (Dr Sahani), and Medicine, Gastrointestinal Unit (Dr Chung), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, and Section of Gastroenterology, Medizinische Klinik Innenstadt, University of Munich, Munich, Germany (Dr Bauer).
 CiteULike  Connotea  Delicious  Digg  Facebook  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
Portomesenteric venous gas and pneumatosis cystoides intestinalis in systemic sclerosis
Ogawa et al.
QJM 2011;0:hcr222v1-hcr222.
FULL TEXT
Portal venous gas: is it a premorbid indicator?
Kailani et al.
BMJ Case Reports 2011;2011:bcr0720103206-bcr0720103206.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Sorting through the evidence of adult pneumatosis intestinalis as a harbinger for disaster vs benign disease.
Atweh and Starker
Arch Surg 2011;146:511-511.
FULL TEXT
Smoke trails of a dying gut: portal and mesenteric vein gas
Gaddam et al.
BMJ Case Reports 2010;2010:bcr0120102660-bcr0120102660.
FULL TEXT
Careful Approach to the ABCs of the Management of Portal Venous Gas
Naguib et al.
Arch Surg 2010;145:103-104.
FULL TEXT
|
