You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 145 No. 1, January 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  Review Article
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (1)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery
 •Surgery
 •Surgical Interventions
 •Surgical Interventions, Other
 •Review
 •Emergency Medicine
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Conversion of Emergent Cricothyrotomy to Tracheotomy in Trauma Patients

Peep Talving, MD, PhD; Joseph DuBose, MD; Kenji Inaba, MD; Demetrios Demetriades, MD, PhD

Arch Surg. 2010;145(1):87-91.

Objectives  To review the literature to determine the rates of airway stenosis after cricothyrotomy, particularly as they compare with previously documented rates of this complication after tracheotomy, and to examine the complications associated with conversion.

Data Sources  We conducted a review of the medical literature by the use of PubMed and OVID MEDLINE databases.

Study Selection  We identified all published series that describe the use of cricothyrotomy, with the inclusion of the subset of patients who require an emergency airway after trauma, from January 1, 1978, to January 1, 2008.

Data Extraction  Only 20 published series of cricothyrotomy were identified: 17 retrospective reports and 3 prospective, observational series.

Data Synthesis  Considerable variance in methods and follow-up periods were noted between examinations. Published experiences documented the results of 1134 total patients for whom cricothyrotomy was performed, including 368 trauma patients who underwent emergent cricothyrotomy. The rate of chronic subglottic stenosis among survivors after cricothyrotomy was 2.2% (11/511) overall and 1.1% (4/368) among trauma patients for follow-up periods with a range from 2 to 60 months. Only 1 (0.27%) of the 368 trauma patients in whom an emergent cricothyrotomy was performed required surgical treatment for chronic subglottic stenosis. Although the literature that documents complications of surgical airway conversion is scarce, rates of severe complications of up to 43% were reported.

Conclusions  Cricothyrotomy after trauma is safe for initial airway access among patients who require the establishment of an emergent airway. The prolonged use of a cricothyrotomy tube, however, remains controversial. Although no study to date has demonstrated any benefit of routine conversion to tracheostomy, considerable deficiencies in existing studies highlight the need for further investigations of this practice.


Author Affiliations: Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Los Angeles County and University of Southern California Medical Center, Los Angeles.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2010 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.