You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 133 No. 11, November 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Correspondence and Brief Communications
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on ISI (2)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Letter to the Editor

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Iwant to make a strong plea against the conclusion reached by Leber et al1 in their retrospective study about long-term complications of prosthetic incisional hernioplasty. Their analysis of the data shows that polyester mesh (Mersilene) should not be used in the repair of incisional hernias. Their condemnation of the use of polyester mesh prosthesis to repair large incisional hernias is unacceptable to me and certainly to many European surgeons interested in surgery of the abdominal wall.

In this retrospective study the authors erroneously indict Mersilene in comparison with Marlex, Prolene, and Gore-Tex mesh as responsible for many of the early and late complications in abdominal incisional hernioplasties. My method of repair is similar to those used by Jean Rives, MD, Jean B. Flament, MD, Jean P. Palot, MD, and, in the United States, George E. Wantz, MD. It is clearly described in Hernias and Surgery of the Abdominal Wall, . . . [Full Text of this Article]







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1998 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.