This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Humanities  • History of Medicine  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Ira M. Rutkow, MD, MPH, DrPH

Arch Surg. 1998;133:1372.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

FOR PHYSICIANS-TO-BE and surgeons-to-be, an understanding of human anatomy is a fundamental prerequisite of their education and training. Important as dissection is to comprehending the human condition, there existed strong popular prejudice against it in antebellum America. Societal indignation proved a constant deterrent to anatomical instructors and their steady supply of cadavers. With dissection riots occurring intermittently, including the widely reported trashing of surgeon John Davidge's (1768-1829) anatomical theater in Baltimore, Md (1807), medical school faculty members were often forced to calm public opinion. For instance, the physician/surgeons who taught at the Vermont Academy of Medicine, Castleton, disseminated a proclamation in the mid 1820s, declaring, somewhat dubiously, that "bodies disinterred hereabouts would not be used in the department of practical anatomy."

This intriguing papier-mâché mannequin served American medical students and surgeons as an anatomical model. At a time when human cadavers were scarce and . . . [Full Text of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?