This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Surgery, Other  • Alert me on articles by topic

Ira M. Rutkow, MD, MPH, DrPH

Arch Surg. 2000;135:872.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

FROM A HISTORICAL perspective, the importance of the American Surgical Association and its founding in 1880, was that it represented the first attempt to bring together on a national level, admittedly in a small number, men of great professional stature whose reputations and deeds marked them as surgeons. To assure that its intentions were well publicized, the organization made certain that a record of its annual meeting was published in the form of bound transactions that could be easily disseminated. Since separation between surgical specialties did not yet exist in the United States, the only criterion for membership was simply that a physician have a "name" as a surgeon; not an orthopedic surgeon, not a urologic surgeon, not a gynecologic surgeon, but simply, a "surgeon." Not surprisingly, the formation of the nation's first surgical organization was adamantly opposed by the American Medical Association (founded . . . [Full Text of this Article]