 |
|
A Prospective Randomized Trial on Heart Rate Variability of the Surgical Team During Laparoscopic and Conventional Sigmoid Resection—Invited Critique
Jon van Heerden, MD
Rochester, Minn
Arch Surg. 2001;136:310.
|
|
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
|
|
The authors of this study conclude that although laparoscopic colorectal surgery may be good for the patient, it may, in fact, be bad for the operating surgeon(s)! What a provocative, refreshing, unique, but perhaps not new, idea.
It is a well-known fact that individual physicians have vastly different reactions to stress, with "emergency" catecholamine release being much more prevalent in surgical vs nonsurgical personnel. This global difference between specialties was emphasized by the British surgeon Sir Ian Aird more than 50 years ago in an analysis of the hobbies of doctors—surgeons competed in the Olympics, whereas psychiatrists collected butterflies. Who is to quibble as to who is the wiser?
What is less well known, or certainly less often discussed in open forum, is the fact that there is currently a generation of practicing surgeons (they could be termed, gray-haired, experienced, or non-Nintendo) who . . . [Full Text of this Article]
RELATED ARTICLE
A Prospective Randomized Trial on Heart Rate Variability of the Surgical Team During Laparoscopic and Conventional Sigmoid Resection
Bartholomäus Böhm, Nikolaus Rötting, Wolfgang Schwenk, Susanne Grebe, and Ulrich Mansmann
Arch Surg. 2001;136(3):305-310.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|
