You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 136 No. 4, April 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Invited Critique
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Is Unplanned Return to the Operating Room a Useful Quality Indicator in General Surgery?—Invited Critique

Gerald W. Peskin, MD
Oakland, Calif

Arch Surg. 2001;136:411.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

The second most difficult decision in surgery is when to operate. The most difficult decision is when to reoperate.—Claude H. Organ, Jr, MD

The VA Outcomes Group and the Quality Scholars Program at Dartmouth led by John Birkmeyer, MD, have undertaken a review of unplanned returns to the operating room following a series of general surgery cases. The purpose of their presentation is the utilization of these data as a means of assessing the quality of a general surgery service.

While the hypothesis is a commendable one, there are many reasons why patients may require reoperation following initial procedures. Although technical error is certainly one of these reasons, many patient- and hospital-related factors are difficult to quantify in terms of their contribution to untoward patient outcomes (ie, type of hospital, presence of house staff and medical students, criteria for reoperation as opposed to nonoperative approaches . . . [Full Text of this Article]


RELATED ARTICLE

Is Unplanned Return to the Operating Room a Useful Quality Indicator in General Surgery?
John D. Birkmeyer, Leigh S. Hamby, Christian M. Birkmeyer, Maureen V. Decker, Nancy M. Karon, and Richard W. Dow
Arch Surg. 2001;136(4):405-411.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2001 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.