You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 137 No. 10, October 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Invited Critique
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Surgery, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Failed Pilonidal Surgery—Invited Critique

Eric A. Weiss, MD
Orange Park, Fla

Arch Surg. 2002;137:1151.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

The authors report their experience of 31 patients with recalcitrant pilonidal disease. All patients had persistent open wounds and had at least 2 previous operations. The authors describe their operation of choice: the cleft lift. In this procedure, skin is excised from the left gluteus maximus and an advancement flap is created from the right gluteus maximus. The advancement flap redrapes across the cleft and closes the pilonidal wound and the left-sided skin defect. Twenty-eight patients received this operation, with most healing primarily and quickly, and all 31 patients healing eventually.

The authors point out that the nature of the pilonidal wounds predisposes to a failure to heal. They state that healing fails in "dirty ditches," ie, at the bottom of deep, moist, warm clefts despite carefully placed packing or stitches. Even normal skin breaks down in such sites. Thus, the primary source of surgical failure . . . [Full Text of this Article]


RELATED ARTICLE

Failed Pilonidal Surgery: New Paradigm and New Operation Leading to Cures
John Bascom and Thomas Bascom
Arch Surg. 2002;137(10):1146-1150.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.