 |
|
Invited Critique
Stephen W. Behrman, MD
Memphis, Tenn
Arch Surg. 2002;137:1048.
|
|
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
|
|
The development of a pancreatic fistula following pancreatoduodenectomy, with its inherent morbidity and mortality, remains important. In reported series, it is most often associated with a soft (normal) pancreas and a nondilated duct of Wirsung. In their article, Suzuki and colleagues raise 2 issues. First, which technique of reestablishing gastrointestinal continuity to the remnant pancreas is superior? Second, they help define just what constitutes a pancreatic fistula.
Published reports have focused on technical nuances and adjunctive agents that may help to diminish pancreaticoenteric disruption. Duct-to-mucosa reconstruction, pancreatic invagination, duct ligation, pancreaticogastrostomy, fibrin glue, duct stenting, octreotide, and combinations thereof have all been supported. Despite varying techniques, most recent series consistently report fistula rates ranging between 5% and 20%. In the accomplished hands of the authors, pancreatic fistula rates with their techniques were equal to, but not better than, others reported in the literature. Should the technique . . . [Full Text of this Article]
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLE
Selection of Pancreaticojejunostomy Techniques According to Pancreatic Texture and Duct Size
Yasuyuki Suzuki, Yasuhiro Fujino, Yasuki Tanioka, Kunihiko Hiraoka, Moriatsu Takada, Tetsuo Ajiki, Yoshifumi Takeyama, Yonson Ku, and Yoshikazu Kuroda
Arch Surg. 2002;137(9):1044-1047.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|
