You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 138 No. 4, April 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  Special Feature
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Radiologic Imaging
 •Surgery
 •Surgical Interventions
 •Bariatric Surgery
 •Gastrointestinal/ Upper Foregut
 •Diagnosis
 •Computed Tomography
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Image of the Month—Quiz Case

Kevin Cho, BA; Collin E. M. Brathwaite, MD; Arif Ahmad, MD
From the School of Medicine, State University of New York at Stony Brook (Mr Cho); and the Department of Surgery, Stony Brook University Hospital (Drs Brathwaite and Ahmad), New York, NY.

Arch Surg. 2003;138:455.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

INTRODUCTION

A 38-YEAR-OLD white woman with a height of 167.6 cm and weight of 136.1 kg (body mass index, 48 [calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared]) underwent laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) for morbid obesity. Comorbidities included dyslipidemia, osteoarthritis, urinary stress incontinence, and depression. Preoperative testing included endoscopy, which demonstrated grade III esophagitis. No gallstones were evident on abdominal ultrasound.

Laparoscopic RYGBP gastric bypass was performed without complications, and the patient's recovery was uneventful until postoperative day 2, when she developed sudden abdominal pain. An upper gastrointestinal series with oral contrast is shown in Figure 1. Although she remained afebrile and her urine output was adequate, she became tachycardic (120-130 beats/min) and complained of generalized abdominal pain. A computed tomographic scan of the abdomen with oral and intravenous contrast is shown in Figure 2. . . [Full Text of this Article]

What Is the Diagnosis?



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Image of the Month—Diagnosis
Arch Surg. 2003;138(4):456.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.